Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gaurav Bharatbhai Malviya vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2138 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2138 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Gaurav Bharatbhai Malviya vs State Of Gujarat on 9 April, 2026

                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/8193/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

                                                                                                               undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 8193 of 2026

                     ==========================================================
                                                     GAURAV BHARATBHAI MALVIYA
                                                               Versus
                                                         STATE OF GUJARAT
                     ==========================================================
                     Appearance:
                     MR SAGAR D VAGHASIYA(13308) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                     MS.JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                     ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 09/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of

the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for

enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with

FIR being C.R. No.11210062250085 of 2025 registered

with Cyber Crime Police Station, Surat City, for the offence

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8193/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3),

340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 66(C) and

66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2008.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature

of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on

regular bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-

sheet is filed, further incarceration of the applicant will not

benefit the Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further

contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to abide

by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if

released on bail. Learned advocate upon instructions

submits that the applicant will remain within the State of

Gujarat during the trial.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8193/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Surat City,

hence would be available at the time of trial.

ii. The investigation being over, charge-sheet has been

filed before the concerned competent Court.

iii. The applicant was an employee in the office of co-

accused Abhishek Ashokkumar.

iv. The applicant's role is as regards he having sent

details of five credit cards on whasapp of co-accused

Gautam.

v. The apprehension of the learned APP as regards the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8193/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

applicant after being released on bail would once again

indulge in similar or such offenses can be put to rest by

imposing stringent conditions.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against the

applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is

of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

with FIR being C.R. No.11210062250085 of 2025

registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Surat City, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8193/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

Thousand only) with one local surety of the like amount to

the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within

a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall

file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond along with documentary proof and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O.

and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Sunday before the concerned

police station till the trial is over.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8193/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is

not required in connection with any other offence for the

time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent Court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose

of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule

is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter