Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shashankkumar Anilkumar Mishra vs State Election Commission, Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2125 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2125 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shashankkumar Anilkumar Mishra vs State Election Commission, Gujarat on 9 April, 2026

                                                                                                                   NEUTRAL CITATION




                           C/SCA/5202/2026                                        JUDGMENT DATED: 09/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5202 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                       SHASHANKKUMAR ANILKUMAR MISHRA
                                                     Versus
                                   STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, GUJARAT & ORS.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR. A. J. YAGNIK, ADVOCATE FOR MR MEHUL B DHONDE(12928)
                      for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                      AISHVARYA(8018) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      MS. SHRUTI DHRUVE, ADDL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
                      Respondent(s) No. 3
                      MR CHINMAY M GANDHI(3979) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
                              and
                              HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                                                        Date : 09/04/2026

                                                 JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)

1. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the electoral roll of Ward No. 5 of the Vapi Municipal Corporation for the upcoming Municipal Corporation elections.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that his name had been deleted from the Chharvada Assembly Constituency in the month of December, 2025 and at the request of the petitioner, his name was included in the said

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/5202/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

Chharvada Assembly Constituency on 17.02.2026. It is the case of the petitioner that despite the fact that his name was found in the Chharvada Assembly Constituency, while preparing the electoral roll for the Vapi Municipal Corporation, his name was excluded. It is his submission that once the electoral roll of the Assembly Constituency is the basis for the preparation of the electoral roll of the Municipal Corporation, his name cannot be excluded.

3. On the other hand, the learned Counsel appearing for the State Election Commission contends that even according to the petitioner, his name had been entered into a notified area in the electoral rolls, and since the notified area was admittedly outside the geographical limits of the Vapi Municipal Corporation, the exclusion of the petitioner's name cannot be found fault with.

4. In response, the learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner is a resident of Block No. E-405, Rajmoti-2, Chharvada Road, Vapi, Valsad, and the petitioner is one of the residents of the entire area in E-Block. He submits that as per the electoral roll prepared for the Municipal Corporation, Ward No. 5, the residents of Block No. E i.e., people residing on the first, second, and third floors, were included, but his

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/5202/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

name was excluded, though he was residing in the fourth floor of the same block. To substantiate the same, the learned Counsel points out the electoral list at page - 412 of the petition and points out that people from serial Nos. 870 to 875 were residents of the lower floors i.e., the first, second, and third floors.

5. Learned Counsel points out that this electoral roll relates to the residents of the Rajmoti Complex, thereby indicating that all the residents of the Rajmoti Complex have been included in the electoral roll.

6. Learned Counsel appearing for the State Election Commission is unable to dispute this factual statement.

7. In view of the fact that the entire residents of the Rajmoti-2 Complex have been included in the electoral roll of Ward Number 5 for the Vapi Municipal Corporation, it is obvious that the petitioner's name would also have to be included, more so, when his name is admittedly in the electoral roll of the Chharvada Assembly Constituency, which forms the basis for preparation of the electoral roll by the Municipal Corporation.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/5202/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/04/2026

undefined

8. As a consequence, the writ petition is allowed. The Respondent No.3 is directed to include the name of the petitioner in the electoral roll in respect of Ward No.5 of the Vapi Municipal Corporation. As a necessary consequence, the petitioner shall also be entitled to file his nomination, if he so desires for the forthcoming elections. Direct service is permitted, today.

(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA,J)

(J. L. ODEDRA, J) Mehul Desai

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter