Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pratik S/O Jiteshbhai Kubavat vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2088 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2088 Guj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Pratik S/O Jiteshbhai Kubavat vs State Of Gujarat on 8 April, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/7756/2026                                       ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
                                      AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 7756 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                                PRATIK S/O JITESHBHAI KUBAVAT
                                                             Versus
                                                      STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      ROSHANKUMAR S PARMAR(9538) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR Trupesh Kathiriya, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                         Date : 08/04/2026

                                                              ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Krishan Sharma for learned

advocate Mr. R.S. Parmar appearing on behalf of the applicant and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya,

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7756/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

undefined

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11189004252335 of 2025 registered with Morbi City 'B' Division

Police Station, Morbi, for the offence punishable under Section

316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54, 317(2) of the B.N.S. Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that charge-sheet is filed, no useful

purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for

indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be

imposed by this Court if released on bail.

7. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7756/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

undefined

exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The allegation being that the accused had indulged in the

offence of money laundering through the medium of mule

accounts.

ii. The allegation against the present applicant being that he

had provided bank account of his cousin brother and had also

given his own bank account and whereas, it would appear

that the total amount which had come to these accounts was

around Rs. 5,88,000/-, which were proceeds of cyber crime.

iii. Considering the fact that the amount is comparatively

nominal, and also having regard to the fact that in all 13

complaints, more particularly, the account of the present

applicant having 6 complaints and also considering the fact

that the applicant is in custody since 12.12.2025 and the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7756/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

undefined

charge-sheet having been filed and the applicant having only

one antecedent that too under Section 188 of the IPC, this

Court is inclined to consider this application albeit with

appropriate safeguards.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against in the First Information

Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this

Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No. 11189004252335 of 2025 registered with Morbi City 'B'

Division Police Station, Morbi, on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7756/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

undefined

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that she shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat and the State of Rajasthan

without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change

the residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] to mark his presence once a fortnight for a period of six months

and once a month for a period of six months thereafter, before the

concerned police station;

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if she is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

Court concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the

matter.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7756/2026 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026

undefined

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by

any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature

made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the

application of the applicant for being released on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) PD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter