Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thakor Ashvin @ Vishal Dashrathbhai vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2029 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2029 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Thakor Ashvin @ Vishal Dashrathbhai vs State Of Gujarat on 7 April, 2026

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/7849/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 7849 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                    THAKOR ASHVIN @ VISHAL DASHRATHBHAI & ANR.
                                                       Versus
                                                STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR M R SAIYED(3362) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
                      MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                           Date : 07/04/2026

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. M. R. Saiyed appearing on behalf

of the applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. Jirga

Jhaveri appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicants have filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

No.11206023250568 of 2025 registered with Kheralu Police Station,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7849/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

District Mahesana for the offence punishable under Sections 317(4),

319(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 as well as under Section

66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Amendment Act,

2008.

4. Learned advocate for the applicants would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicants, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail.

It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further

incarceration of the applicants will not benefit the Investigation

Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicants

are ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be

imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicants as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicants and the application

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7849/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicants are a permanent residents of Patan and

Mahesana districts, hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The are no criminal antecedents against the applicants;

iii. No recovery or discovery is to be effected from the

applicants;

iv. The amount of Rs.6,10,000/- was deposited by witnesses in

applicant No.1 Ashvin's account which was handed over to

accused No.1, whereas, Rs.60,000/- deposited in applicant No.2

Hardik's account was also handed over to accused No.1.

v. Accused No.1 Aditji Thakor has been considered by this Court

in regular bail vide order dated 30.03.2026 passed in Criminal

Misc. Application No.7353 of 2026. The roles of the present

applicants and accused No.1 are similar.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7849/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicants in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise

the discretion and enlarge the applicants on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicants are

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No.11206023250568 of 2025 registered with Kheralu Police

Station, District Mahesana, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7849/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

prosecution;

[c] surrender their passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if they does not possess a passport, they shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of their residence to the I.O. and

to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change their residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and

the court;

[f] mark their presence on every Monday before the concerned

police station till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which,

they shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the

police station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicants only if they are not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7849/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in

accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicants on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter