Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashvinbhai Lalabhai Solanki vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1837 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1837 Guj
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ashvinbhai Lalabhai Solanki vs State Of Gujarat on 1 April, 2026

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/6537/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 6537 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                                ASHVINBHAI LALABHAI SOLANKI
                                                           Versus
                                                     STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR V B MALIK(5071) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                              DESAI

                                                           Date : 01/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Nabil Khan appearing on behalf

of learned advocate Mr. V. B. Malik for the applicant and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma appearing on behalf

of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6537/2026 ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

undefined

No.11211015260098 of 2026 registered with Dhrangadhra City

Police Station, District Surendranagar for the offence punishable

under Sections 309(6), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 324(2) and 54 of the

BNS, 2023 and under Section 135 of the G.P Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It

is further contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to

abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if

released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant, this Court may not exercise discretion in favour of the

applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6537/2026 ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

undefined

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Surendranagar

district, hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The are no criminal antecedents against the applicant;

iii. Co-accused Vijaybhai Sureshbhai Vaghela, who had given

blows to the original complainant with an iron pipe has been

considered by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Dhrangadhra

for regular bail vide order passed in Criminal Misc. Application

No.56 of 2026;

iv. The role attributed to the applicant in the crime is about the

being present with a bill-hook and along with co-accused Nilesh,

having looted Rs.50,000/- from the original complainant;

v. The amount of Rs.50,000/- has neither been discovered nor

recovered from the applicant;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6537/2026 ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

undefined

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise

the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No.11211015260098 of 2026 registered with Dhrangadhra

City Police Station, District Surendranagar, on executing a bail bond

of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject

to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6537/2026 ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

undefined

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the

court;

[f] mark his presence on alternate day before the concerned

police station for three months and thereafter every Thursday till

the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which,

he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the police

station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6537/2026 ORDER DATED: 01/04/2026

undefined

Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in

accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter