Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6515 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7968/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
7968 of 2024
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 14492 of 2024
==========================================================
SONIKA AMIT BORDIA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
BHISHMA A. RAWAL(12270) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 7,8
MR. H K PATEL APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
SUMIT K PRAJAPATI(8867) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 11/09/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. The learned A.P.P. waives service of Rule for the
respondent - State.
2. When the matter is called out, heard the learned
advocate for the applicant and it is submitted that there is a
delay of 687 days in preferring the revision application
against the judgment of an acquittal. Perused the contention
raised in the application and further, also perused the
additional affidavit submitted by the applicant. Heard the
learned advocate for the respondent and he has rightly
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7968/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
objected the condonation of delay and submitted that there is
no sufficient cause as has been shown in the application, so,
the delay cannot be condoned.
3. Considered the rival submissions of the respective
parties and perused the contentions raised in the application
and further, in the additional affidavit, it has been specifically
stated that earlier present applicant has approached the
Gujarat High Court Legal Service Committee for filing of this
revision application. One advocate was allotted by the
Committee but he has not filed the petition and subsequently,
the High Court Legal Service Committee allotted the present
advocate and after, he prepared this revision application
along with the delay condone application. In the catena of the
judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, when the technicality
has been treated against the substantial justice, the Court has
to give preference to substantial justice. However, the reason
stated in the application in the additional affidavit is
satisfactory and genuine to this Court. Hence, the present
application deserves consideration.
5. Accordingly, present application is allowed. Delay of 687
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7968/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
days caused in preferring the revision application is hereby
condoned. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. The
present application is disposed of accordingly.
(L. S. PIRZADA, J) JCP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!