Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6506 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10016 of 2025
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
================================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
No
================================================================
SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED
Versus
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER , CENTRAL GST AND
CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PAVAN S GODIAWALA(2936) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MS. KETKI P JHA(9864) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Date : 11/09/2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
Heard learned advocate Mr.Pavan S.
Godiawala for the petitioner, learned advocate
and learned Assistant Government Pleader
Ms.Shrunjal Shah for the respondent No.3.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned
advocate Ms.Ketki Jha waives service of notice
of rule for and on behalf of the respondent
Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government
Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah waives service of
notice of rule for and on behalf of the
respondent No.3.
2.1. Learned advocate Mr.Pavan Godiawala
for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has challenged the Order-in-
Original dated dated 26th February, 2025
passed by the respondent No.2-Assistant
Commissioner of State Tax, Unit-8, Ahmedabad
under Section 73 of the Gujarat Goods and
Services Tax Act, 2017.
2.2. It was submitted that the petitioner-
Company is a Non-Banking Finance Company
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
engaged in the business of equipment financing
logistic solutions, etc. and by order dated
08.10.2021 passed by the NCLT, Kolkatta Bench,
CIRP was initiated against the SREI
Infrastructure Finance Limited (SIFL).
2.3. Learned advocate Mr.Pavan Godiawala
submitted that a Resolution plan submitted by
National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
for the Corporate Debtors came to be approved
under Section 31 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 vide order dated
11.08.2023 passed by the NCLT, Kolkatta.
3. The National Company Law Tribunal, by
order dated 11th August, 2023 held as under :
"115. We have perused the reliefs, waivers and concessions as sought and as given in Section 10 at Pages 105-115 of the Resolution Plan. While some of
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
the reliefs, waivers and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicant come within the purview of the Code while many others fall under the power and jurisdiction of different government authorities/departments. This Adjudicating Authority has power to grant reliefs, waivers and concessions only in relation to the Code and the Companies Act 2013 (within the powers of the NCLT) for achieving the objective of the Code. No reliefs, waivers and concessions that fall within the domain of other government department/authorities are granted. The reliefs, waivers and concessions that pertain to other governmental authorities/departments shall be dealt with the respective competent authorities/forums/offices, Government or Semi Government of the State or Central Government with regard to the respective reliefs, waivers and concessions. The competent authorities including the Appellate authorities may consider grant such reliefs, waivers
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
and concessions keeping in view the spirit of the Code.
118. With respect to the waivers with regard to extinguishment of claims which arose Pre-CIRP and which have not been claimed are granted in terms of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt Ltd v Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that once a resolution plan is duly approved by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (1) of section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the Corporate Debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Govt, any State Govt or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. We place reliance on the recent judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan in the matter of EMC v. State of Rajasthan wherein it has been inter-alia held that :
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
"Law is well-settled that with the finalization of insolvency resolution plan and the approval thereof by the NCLT, all dues of creditors, Corporate, Statutory and others stand extinguished and no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date."
On the date of approval of resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Govt, any State Govt or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
Adjudicating Authority grants its approval under section 31 could be continued."
4. In view of the above observation made by
the NCLT, the respondent-Authority could not
have issued the notice as held by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in case of Ghanashyam Mishra and
Sons Pvt. Ltd. Versus Edelweiss Asset
Reconstruction Company Ltd reported in 2021 9
SCC 657 as under :
"102. In the result, we answer the questions framed by us as under:
102.1. That once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.
102.2. The 2019 Amendment to Section 31 of the I&B Code is clarificatory and declaratory in nature and therefore will be effective from the date on which the I&B Code has come into effect.
102.3. Consequently all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued."
5. Considering the above decision as well as
the order passed by the NCLT, the impugned
order dated 26th February, 2025 passed by the
respondent No.2 would not survive as the same
is passed for Financial Year 2021 raising the
demand under the GST Act which is prior to the
date of the order of the NCLT passed on 11th
August, 2023 approving the Resolution Plan
wherein, the NCLT has held that on the date of
approval of the Resolution Plan, all claims
which are not part of the Resolution Plan
shall stand extinguished and no person would
be entitled to initiate or continue any
proceedings in respect to a claim which is not
part of the Resolution Plan.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
6. Therefore, no demand can be raised for the
period prior to the specified date/date of
approval of the Resolution Plan. The
respondent-Authority therefore could not have
conducted the proceedings under the provisions
of the GST Act for the Financial Year 2021
raising the demand by passing the impugned
Order-in-Original on 26th February, 2025.
7. The petition therefore succeeds and is
accordingly allowed. The impugned order dated
26th February, 2025 is hereby quashed and set
aside. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
extent. No orders as to cost.
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
(PRANAV TRIVEDI,J) PALAK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!