Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6493 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/1666/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 1666 of 2025
==========================================================
RAJUBHAI BABUBHAI RABARI (JALASANVALA)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. NIRAJ SHARMA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 11/09/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service on behalf of the Respondent - State.
2. Learned advocate Ms. Nishita Prajapati stated that she has instructions to appear on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 - Original Complainant and seeks permission to file Vakalatnama. Registry to accept the Vakalatnama and also placed on record the affidavit filed by the respondent no.2 and further submitted that the respondent no.2 - Chiragkumar Jayantibhai Patel is present.
3. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and it is submitted that the present applicant - accused is in judicial custody and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the cheque amount has already been paid to the complainant.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/1666/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
4. The original complainant is present before the Court and when asked by the Court, he submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and he has no objection, if conviction is set aside. Further, original complainant submitted that 20% of the cheque amount which has been deposited by the present applicant - accused, is to be refunded to the original complainant. Further, in support of his contention, the original complainant has filed his affidavit on record and confirmed the signature on the affidavit. Considering the fact that the present accused is convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with compoundable offence and the matter is amicably settled between the parties, the judgment passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Petlad in Criminal Case No.455 of 2022 dated 25.04.2024, convicting the present applicant original accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced him to 1 year simple imprisonment as well as the judgment passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Petlad in Criminal Appeal No.15 of 2024 dated 17.06.2025, rejecting the appeal and confirming the judgment of the learned Trial Court is hereby quashed and set aside. The present applicant accused is hereby acquitted from all the charges and his bail bond stands cancelled accordingly. The present applicant - accused is in judicial custody and be released on bail immediately from the jail, if is not required in any other offences. The amount of Rs.1,40,000/- which has been deposited by the present applicant - accused before the learned Sessions Court, is to be
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/1666/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
paid to the original complainant - Mr. Chiragkumar Jayantibhai Patel by the concerned Registry after due verification.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H. reported in AIR 2010 SC (1907), the applicant has to pay Rs.10,000/- before the Gujarat State Legal Service Authority within a period of 3 weeks.
6. The present application is disposed of accordingly.
7. Rule is made absolute. Direct Service is permitted.
(L. S. PIRZADA, J) JCP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!