Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6232 Guj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4165 of 2024
==========================================================
CHARMI KANCHANBHAI PATEL
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SAMIR B GOHIL(5718) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2
SERVED BY RPAD (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 02/09/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Samir Gohil appearing on
behalf of the petitioner and learned Assistant Government
Pleader Mr.Aditya Pathak appearing on behalf of the
respondent - State.
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks indulgence
of this Court inasmuch as the scholarship which the petitioner
would be entitled to more particularly as per the policy of the
Central Government i.e. vide scheme of the post-matrix
scholarship to the students belonging to the scheduled caste,
having not been given to the present petitioner.
3. Briefly stated, the case of the present petitioner is that
she belonged to scheduled caste category, had completed her
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
post matriculation in the State of Gujarat and had got
admission in the M.B.B.S. course in one M/s. Specific Institute
of Medical Science, Udaipur in government quota in academic
year 2021-22 onwards.
3.1. It is the case of the petitioner that while the fees paid to
the petitioner for the State quota is approximately
Rs.21,00,000/-, the same has not been reimbursed by the
State.
4. Learned advocate Mr.Gohil would draw the attention of
this Court to a judgment passed by this Court dated
19.08.2025 in Special Civil Application No.11134/2025, in a
similar situation albeit in case of a candidate who belonged to
the scheduled tribe category. Learned advocate would submit
that in case of the said candidate, the Tribal Development
Department, relying upon a fee structure approved by the
State of Rajasthan by the Fee Recommendation Committee for
the year 2016-17, had paid to the petitioner therein an
amount of Rs.2.95 lakhs per year.
4.1. Learned advocate would further submit that vide the
said judgment, this Court had also reserved liberty in favour
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
of the petitioner to file an appropriate application for revision
of the amount granted more particularly having regard to the
fact that there may be an upward revision in the fee structure
for the M.B.B.S. course from the year 2016-17 to date.
4.2. Learned advocate would submit that if this Court may
direct the State Authorities to pay to the petitioner the
amount of Rs.2.95 lakhs for the years which she has
completed and for the years which she will further undertake
to prosecute the course in question with a liberty in favour of
the petitioner to apply for revision in case appropriate
documents i.e. the recommendation of the FRC for the
relevant years are received, the grievance of the petitioner
could be assuaged.
5. Learned AGP Mr.Pathak, under instructions, would
submit that as per the report of the Fee Regulatory
Committee for the year 2016-17 more particularly since the
Tribal Development Department has taken a stand with
regard to paying the fees fixed by the Committee for the year
2016-17 as a base fee, therefore, appropriate orders may be
passed by this Court.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
6. Considering the submissions made by learned advocates
for the respective parties and having perused the order dated
19.08.2025, it would appear to this Court that in case of a
similarly situated candidate more particularly for the very
selfsame scholarship scheme, except the petitioner herein
belonging to the scheduled caste category and the petitioner
before this Court in Special Civil Application No.11134/2025
belonging to scheduled tribe category, all other conditions
appear to be similar. Having regard to said position and
further considering that in case of the petitioner of the former
petition, the Tribal Development Department of the State had
granted an amount of Rs.2.95 lakhs per year basis the fees
structure approved by the Fee Regulatory Committee of the
State of Rajasthan for the year 2016-17, to this Court, it would
appear that the said amount is required to be directed to be
paid to the petitioner.
6.1. Furthermore, it would also appear that this Court had
reserved liberty in case of the petitioner therein to file an
appropriate application in case the petitioner is able to
receive appropriate documents in this regard subject to the
condition that the Central Government shall pay the amount
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
upto Rs.6 lakhs and whereas, the remaining amount would be
paid by the State Government.
7. Hence, the following directions:-
(i) The petitioner shall make an appropriate application to
the authority concerned for grant of scholarship as per the fee
structure fixed by the Fee Regulatory Committee for the State
of Rajasthan for M.B.B.S. course for the year 2016-17 within a
period of 10 days from the date of receipt of this order, which
shall be considered by the authorities within a period of four
weeks thereafter. The authority, at the first instance, shall
consider the case of the petitioner and if found eligible, shall
pay to the petitioner the amount as per the fee structure
approved for the year 2016-17, for the years 2021-22, 2022-23
and 2023-24 and so on, i.e. the years of study put in by the
petitioner and the later years which the petitioner would put
in.
(ii) The petitioner is at liberty to once again approach the
respondent authorities, in case the petitioner is able to gather
details as regards the fee fixed by the Fee Regulatory
Committee for the Institution in which the petitioner is
studying, for the year 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/4165/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2025
undefined
(iii) In case the fee fixed by the FRC is beyond the amount of
Rs.2.95 lakhs, then as per the scheme, read with the
Government Resolution 05.08.2023, the State shall pay to the
petitioner the amount upto Rs.6 lakhs, from the grant
received from the Central Government in this regard and
whereas the remaining amount would be borne by the State
Government itself.
(iv) It would be open for the petitioner to seek for fees, for
the remaining years, as fixed by the FRC and whereas if no
such details are available, then the benchmark fee of Rs. 2.95
lakhs or any later benchmark fee, as fixed by the FRC of the
State of Rajasthan, would be paid by the State Government to
the petitioner, subject to the observations hereinabove as
regards the petitioner being entitled to claim for revision with
appropriate details of the fee fixed by the FRC for the said
years.
8. With the above observations and directions, the present
petition stands disposed of as partly allowed.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) Bhoomi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!