Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hiteshkumar Lavjibhai Patel vs Manoj Aggarwal, Ias, Additional Chief ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7355 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7355 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Hiteshkumar Lavjibhai Patel vs Manoj Aggarwal, Ias, Additional Chief ... on 9 October, 2025

Author: A.Y. Kogje
Bench: A.Y. Kogje, Samir J. Dave
                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/MCA/2018/2025                               ORDER DATED: 09/10/2025

                                                                                                          undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RESTORATION) NO. 2018 of 2025

                                         In R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 76 of 2023
                       ================================================================
                                       HITESHKUMAR LAVJIBHAI PATEL
                                                    Versus
                            MANOJ AGGARWAL, IAS, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.
                       ================================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR. NISHIT P GANDHI(6946) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
                       SIDDHARTH R KHESKANI(9483) for the Opponent(s) No. 5
                       ===============================================================
                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
                               and
                               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMIR J. DAVE

                                              Date : 09/10/2025
                                               ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)

1. This application is filed for following reliefs:-

"(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to revive the Misc. Civil Application No.76 of 2023 and further be pleased to direct the restoration of the same to it's original file.

2. This application is filed in view of the liberty reserved in para-3 of our order dated 19.09.2024.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has drawn our attention to two orders, first by the Apex Court dated 18.03.2025 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.15115 of 2023 and CAV Judgment pronounced on 26.06.2025 in Misc. Civil Application (For Review) No.1 of 2022 in Letters Patent Appeal No.1327 of 2019.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/MCA/2018/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/10/2025

undefined

4. Learned advocate submitted that similarly situated persons have also preferred separate application under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act being Misc. Civil Application No.795 of 2022 and allied matters, where these applications stood disposed of by an order dated 17.09.2025, where in para-2 this Court has made observations as under:-

"2. We appreciate the concern of the learned advocates appearing for the applicants since they are waiting for the actual benefits to be paid for more than three and a half years. However, since the SLP is dismissed by the Supreme Court on 08.09.2025 laying quietus to the entire controversy, and looking to the fact that there are more than 2800 employees and an amount of Rs.1400 Crores is also involved, we accede to the request of the learned Additional Advocate General. We direct that the actual benefits to the present applicants shall be paid within a period of 3 months. With this observations, we further clarify that the limitation of 3 months for granting the benefit shall apply to the petitioners who have approached this Court and so far as the similarly situated employees are concerned, who have not approached this Court, the State may extend such benefits as per their convenience."

5. It is the submission of learned advocate that similar direction will also be required to be passed individually in the case of the present applicant and hence, seeking recall of the order and placing the main application for contempt on the record of this case. Hence, the applicant being identically situated, similar order would be required to be passed as now the proceedings mentioned

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/MCA/2018/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/10/2025

undefined

in para-3 of our order dated 19.09.2024 have now come to conclusion.

6. Learned advocate Ms. Yukta Sumara for learned advocate Mr. Siddharth Kheskani appearing for respondent No.5 has objected to the application by submitting that after the order passed in review application by this Court, compliance will have to be made in terms of the directions contained in the CAV Judgment in the review application and therefore, it cannot be said that any cause of action for reviving the contempt petition has arisen.

7. In view of the aforesaid development, present application is allowed. The Misc. Civil Application (For Contempt) No.76 of 2023 stands revived in terms of the liberty granted in para-3 of our order dated 19.09.2024.

(A.Y. KOGJE, J)

(SAMIR J. DAVE,J) SIDDHARTH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter