Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7174 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3368/2025 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3368
of 2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 18160 of 2025
==========================================================
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., VALSAD
Versus
RASIKBHAI KALUBHAI VADHU & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MASUMI V NANAVATY(9321) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,4,5,6,7
UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Date : 03/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application has been preferred for seeking
condonation of delay of 130 days caused in preferring the appeal
against the impugned judgment and award dated 21.09.2024
passed in M.A.C.P. No.98 of 2020.
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the
delay of 130 days in preferring the appeal occurred owing to the
reasons that the necessary papers were sent from branch office
to head office of the Insurance Company for seeking the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3368/2025 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
permission to prefer the appeal, therefore, the applicant could
not prefer the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation.
4. The notices have been duly served upon all the
respondents. Despite service of notices, they have chosen not to
appear before the Court when the matter was called out.
5. However, learned advocate Mr. Digvijay Singh appearing on
behalf of the learned advocate Mr. Rituraj M. Meena for the
respondent no.3 submitted that considering the facts and
circumstances of the present case, the appropriate order may be
passed.
6. Considering the fact that the delay has occurred owing to
the transmission of the record from the branch office to the head
office and in conveying the necessary instructions for briefing, in
my view, the cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay.
Hence, the delay of 130 days caused in preferring the appeal is
hereby condoned. The present Civil Application stands allowed.
No order as to costs. The present application is disposed of.
7. Registry is directed to reflect the name of the learned
advocate Mr. Rituraj M. Meena for respondent No. 3 in the cause
list of the First Appeal.
(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!