Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Patel Niteshkumar Bhikhabhai vs Special Land Acquisition Officer
2025 Latest Caselaw 5039 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5039 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Patel Niteshkumar Bhikhabhai vs Special Land Acquisition Officer on 23 June, 2025

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/FA/2412/2010                                JUDGMENT DATED: 23/06/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                              R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2412 of 2010
                                                           With
                                              R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2413 of 2010

                        FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                        =======================================

                                    Approved for Reporting      Yes     No
                                                                 --     No
                        =======================================
                                      PATEL NITESHKUMAR BHIKHABHAI
                                                   Versus
                                 SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ANR.
                        =======================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR KM SHETH(838) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
                        MS AGNEYA MANKAD AGP for the Defendant(s) No. 1
                        MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
                        =======================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.
                                PRACHCHHAK

                                                       Date : 23/06/2025

                                                   COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Present appeals are filed by the appellants - original claimants under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter be referred to as "the Act") read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 challenging the judgment

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/2412/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 23/06/2025

undefined

and award dated 21.07.2009 passed by the learned 3 rd Additional District Judge, District Court, Mehsana (hereinafter be referred to as "the Reference Court") in Land Acquisition Reference Nos.99 of 2002 and 100 of 2002 whereby the Reference Court has awarded Rs.42.11 per square meter over-and-above the amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer which comes Rs.66.11 per square meter.

2. For the purpose of construction of residential colony for ONGC, Ahmedabad Project Well No.S.K.D.D. the State Government acquired the lands of the appellants - original claimants situated at Village: Kadi, Taluka: Kadi, District:

Mehsana. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter be referred to as "the Act") dated 24.08.2000 has been issued. An amount of Rs.250/- per square meter has been demanded by the appellants, but the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.24/- per square meter by passing an award dated 11.04.2000.

3. Being aggrieved, the appellants - original claimants, who preferred the aforesaid LAR Cases under Section 18 of the Act for additional compensation of Rs.250/- per square meter. However, the judgment and award dated 21.07.2009 came to be passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, District Court, Mehsana. This has aggrieved the appellants, have preferred the present appeals raising various grounds.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/2412/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 23/06/2025

undefined

4. Heard Mr.K. M. Sheth, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Ms.Agneya Mankad, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr.Rituraj Meena, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

5. Mr.Sheth, learned counsel has submitted the same facts which are narrated in the memo of appeals. He has relied upon the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Godavariben Karshanbhai Patel and others Vs. Group General Manager and another dated 24.04.2017 passed in Civil Appeal No. 5541 of 2017 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the Notification under Section 4 of the Act dated 23.09.1984 where the landowners received Rs.30/- per square meter and the same rate whereby the Reference Court awarded Rs.124/- per square meter, though the High Court has interfered with the decision of the Reference Court and reduced the amount in that circumstances. Mr.Sheth, learned counsel has submitted that in the present appeals, a Notification under Section 4 was issued on 24.08.2000, whereas, in relation to the acquisition of the lands of Village: Nani Kadi, Taluka: Kadi, District: Mehsana, a Notification under Section 4 was issued on 26.04.1999 so there was a gap of more than one year and five months in issuance of both the notification. He has submitted that in the present appeals, the Special Land Acquisition Officer has awarded compensation of Rs.24/- per square meter of the land, whereas, in the case of Village: Nani Kadi, the Special Land

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/2412/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 23/06/2025

undefined

Acquisition Officer has awarded compensation of Rs.30/- per square meter. He has submitted that in the present appeals, the claimants have demanded Rs.250/- per square meter, whereas, in earlier group of matters, the claimants have demanded Rs.150/- per square meter, thereafter, the matter reached upto the High Court and subsequently this Court was pleased to decrease the amount from the original amount of award and, therefore, the matter reached upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has, ultimately, held that the amount which was fixed by the Reference Court is just and proper and the award passed by the Reference Court came to be confirmed. Mr.Sheth, learned counsel has submitted that in view of the aforesaid facts, the appeals deserve to be allowed and the award of compensation deserves to be enhanced.

6. Per contra, Mr.Meena, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has submitted that the amount of compensation awarded by the Reference Court is just and proper and the same is relating to Village: Kadi and not for Village: Nani Kadi and, therefore, the decision relied upon on behalf of the appellants is not applicable to the facts of the present case. Mr.Meena, learned counsel is unable to controvert the fact which is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the amount of compensation awarded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

7. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and the decision of

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/2412/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 23/06/2025

undefined

the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the material placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that the appeals require consideration and the impugned judgment and award deserves to be modified to the extent.

8. Resultantly, following final order is passed:-

Both the first appeals are hereby allowed. The appellants - claimants of these appeals shall be entitled to get Rs.73.39/- per square meter in addition to the amount of Rs.24/- per square meter awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Rs.42.11 per square meter awarded by the Reference Court, Mehsana the total amount comes to Rs.139.50 per square meter. The respondent shall deposit additional amount of compensation within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. On deposit of the amount, the same shall be disbursed in favour of the each claimant through RTGS / NEFT and the bank account details shall be furnished by the counsel for the claimants to the Registry of the Reference Court, Mehsana. The difference of the Court fees shall be paid to the Registry of the Reference Court. Rest of the judgment and award shall remain unaltered. Decree be drawn accordingly. Record and proceedings be sent back to the concerned Reference Court forthwith.

(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) V.R. PANCHAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter