Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4995 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2088/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/06/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2088 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 7522 of 2025
==========================================================
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Versus
MERUJI SOMAJI THAKOR & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RAJAN J PATEL(6775) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR. APURVA K. JANI FOR MR.MANAN BHATT(6535) for the Respondent(s)
No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 20/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned advocate on
record for the applicant is not present. The application is heard with
the assistance of learned advocates appearing for the respective
respondents.
2. Learned advocates for the respective respondents have
objected to the explanation offered in the application, and has urged
this Court to not to entertain the present application.
3. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective
respondents and having perused the averments made in the
application, it transpires that impugned judgment and order was
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2088/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/06/2025
undefined
pronounced on 21.10.2024. The time was consumed by the applicant-
Corporation in seeking legal opinion, which was received through
learned advocate on record on 05.11.2024. It is further averred in the
application that the file was forwarded to the Divisional Office to
Central Office, and ultimately the decision of the General Manager
was sought for. Vide letter dated 15.02.2025, the advocate for the
applicant was provided with the relevant record to prefer the appeal
before this Court. The appeal was drafted and submitted on
05.03.2025. In the aforesaid process, delay of 35 days had crept in.
4. Noticing the aforesaid averments made in the application and
the explanation offered, and in absence of any contradiction being
brought on record to the aforesaid averments by way of any affidavit,
this Court is inclined to accept the aforesaid explanation to be a
sufficient cause, noticing the fact that all throughout, the applicant-
Corporation was pursuing the proceedings for going in appeal. Hence,
delay of 35 days caused in preferring the appeal, is hereby condoned.
The Civil Application is allowed and stands disposed of. Rule is made
absolute. No order as to costs.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!