Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4988 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/8473/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/06/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
8473 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 16731 of 2025
==========================================================
SONI KANALBHAI JAYANTILAL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. VARUN G RAI(7135) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NADEEM B MANSURI(11332) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS. JYOTI BHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 20/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service for the respondent -
State.
2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and heard
the learned advocate Mr. Nadeem B. Mansuri for the
respondent no.2 - original complainant. Further, it is
submitted by him that the present application has been
preferred to condone the delay of 357 days in preferring the
Criminal Revision Application against the judgment passed by
the learned Trial Court, convicting the present applicant -
accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/8473/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/06/2025
undefined
1881 and the learned Sessions Court has also dismissed the
appeal of the present applicant - accused and confirmed the
judgment passed by the learned Trial Court.
3. The present applicant - accused is in judicial custody
and the delay is unintentional. So, the delay caused is
required to be condoned. Further, it is submitted that the
present applicant is not aware about the legal proceedings
and the financial condition of the petitioner is not good and
because of that the there was a delay of 357 days in
preferring the criminal revision application.
4. Considering the fact that the present applicant - accused
is also in judicial custody, the explanation given is found to be
genuine and satisfactory to this court. Delay is to be
condoned.
5. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed.
6. Delay of 357 days in preferring the criminal revision
application is to be condoned. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent.
(L. S. PIRZADA, J) JCP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!