Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Derenbhai Shaileshbhai Gohel vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 4913 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4913 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Derenbhai Shaileshbhai Gohel vs State Of Gujarat on 19 June, 2025

                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.RA/874/2025                                      ORDER DATED: 19/06/2025

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
                                 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 874 of 2025
                      ==========================================================
                                               DERENBHAI SHAILESHBHAI GOHEL
                                                           Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR JIGAR L PATEL(11596) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS JYOTI BHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================
                       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
                                        Date : 19/06/2025
                                         ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr.Nayan Gupta states that he

has instructions to appear for the respondent no.2 -

complainant and seeks permission to file vakalatnama for

the respondent no.2.

2. Permission is accordingly granted. Registry to

accept the vakalatnama that may be filed by learned

advocate Mr.Gupta.

3. Rule. Learned A.P.P. Ms.Jyoti Bhatt waives service of

Rule for the respondent no.1 - State and learned

advocate Mr.Nayan Gupta waives service of Rule for the

respondent no.2 - original complainant.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/874/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2025

undefined

4. Learned advocate Mr.J.L. Patel for the applicant -

accused submitted that in the present matter, settlement

has been arrived at between the present applicant -

accused and the original complainant and the cheque

amount has already been paid to the original

complainant. On 18.06.2025, when the matter was taken

up for condonation of delay, the respondent no.2 -

complainant was present in the Court and has confirmed

that the amount has already been received by him. Today,

the respondent no.2 has filed affidavit, confirming the

settlement arrived at between the applicant - accused

and the complainant and he has no objection if the

conviction is set aside. The said affidavit is ordered to be

taken on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned

advocate for the applicant and considering the fact that

the present offence is compoundable offence and the

matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the

present revision application is required to be allowed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/874/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2025

undefined

6. The impugned order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the

learned 12th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot

in Criminal Case No.7902 of 2018, convicting the present

applicant - accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo simple

imprisonment for 1 year and directed the applicant -

accused to pay the amount of cheque by way of

compensation within one month from the date of order, in

default, further imprisonment of one month and judgment

and order dated 06.06.2024 passed by the learned

Principal District & Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Criminal

Appeal No.240 of 2022, dismissing the appeal filed by the

present applicant - accused and confirming the order

passed by the learned trial Court are hereby quashed and

set aside and the present applicant - accused is acquitted

from all the charges levelled against him and his bail

bond stands stand cancelled accordingly.

7. Since the present applicant - accused is in judicial

custody, he may be released immediately forthwith, if he

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/874/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2025

undefined

is not required in any other case.

8. Further, if the applicant - accused has deposited any

amount before the learned Sessions Court, the same is to

be paid to the respondent no.2 - original complainant by

the concerned learned Sessions Court upon due

verification.

9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

and considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court

in the case of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H.

reported in AIR 2010 SC (1907), the present applicant -

accused has to deposit 5% of the cheque amount before

the Gujarat State Legal Service Authority within 2 weeks.

10. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. Rule

is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

(L. S. PIRZADA, J) Hitesh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter