Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1548 Guj
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3989/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3989 of
2025
In
R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 141 of 2025
================================================================
JYOTIBEN @ JYOTSANABEN WD/O AJAYKUMAR NANDLAL JOSHI &
ORS.
Versus
SHILPANBHAI THAKORBHAI PATEL & ANR.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
Date : 31/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
1. RULE. Learned Advocate Mr.Rituraj Meena waives
service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2.
2. This application is filed by the applicant under Section
5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 188 days in
preferring Cross-Objections in First Appeal No.3941 of 2024, which
is filed by the appellant-Insurance Company-respondent No.2
herein against judgment and award dated 11.06.2024 passed by
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Auxi.), Palanpur,
Banaskantha in MACP No.242 of 2016.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3989/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
3. Learned Advocate for the applicants-original claimants
drew attention of this Court to the contents of para-3 to 5 of the
application and submitted that there is no intentional delay on the
part of the applicants-original claimants in filing the present Cross-
Objections.
4. Learned advocate for the respondent formally opposes
the grant of application.
5. Considering the aforesaid, particularly, period of 188
days of delay, the Court is of the view that considering the facts
involved in the case, delay cannot be treated as inordinate.
Moreover, main First Appeal No.3941 of 2024 filed by the
Insurance Company is already admitted by order dated 22.11.2024.
6. Considering the submissions and the contents of the
application mentioned hereinabove, the delay is also explained
sufficiently.
7. A reference in this regard may be made to the
judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Sheo Raj Singh
(Deceased) through Legal Representatives and others vs/. Union of
India and Another, reported in, (2023) 10 SCC 531, wherein the
term "Sufficient Cause" was interpreted and the approach of
Courts while deciding application for condonation of delay was
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3989/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
discussed.
8. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. The
delay of 188 is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
(NSSG,J) SHITOLE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!