Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1544 Guj
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/11639/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
11639 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 23447 of 2025
==========================================================
SEEMA SAMIRBHAI DESAI
Versus
PRIYANK KIRITBHAI PARIKH & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
DR BALRAM D JAIN(3146) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. KRUNAL K MODI(7321) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS. JYOTI BHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 31/07/2025
ORAL ORDER
1) Rule. Learned APP waives service for Rule on behalf of
the State.
2) The present application has been preferred by the
present applicant to condone the delay of 342 days in
preferring the revision against the order of the conviction
passed by the learned Appellate Court and dismissing of the
appeal. It is stated in the application that the present
applicant who is a lady, has not been informed by the
advocate regarding the outcome of appeal and subsequently,
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/11639/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
when police came to her house for execution of the warrant
and at that time, she came to know about the fact that the
appeal has already been dismissed and it is prayed that the
delay may be condoned.
3) Learned advocate for the respondent no.1 vehemently
opposed and submitted that the applicant was very much
aware about the outcome of the appeal and she has only
shifted the burden on the advocate that the advocate has not
informed her about the outcome of the appeal, hence, delay
cannot be condoned.
4) After hearing the learned advocates for the respective
parties and perusing the contentions raised in the application,
in the catena of the judgment, the Hon'ble Apex Court has
held that when the technicality has been treated against the
substantial justice, the Court has to give a preference to the
substantial justice.
5) Considering this, the present application requires
consideration. The delay is condoned on the condition to
deposit the 50% of the amount of the cheque before the
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/11639/2025 ORDER DATED: 31/07/2025
undefined
learned Trial Court within 1 week from the date of passing of
this order.
6) Accordingly, present application is allowed. Delay of 342
days caused in preferring the revision application is hereby
condoned. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
(L. S. PIRZADA, J) JCP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!