Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siddharth Monal Shah vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 1929 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1929 Guj
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Siddharth Monal Shah vs State Of Gujarat on 16 January, 2025

Author: Nirzar S. Desai
Bench: Nirzar S. Desai
                                                                                                                      NEUTRAL CITATION




                            C/SCA/14717/2019                                            ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

                                                                                                                       undefined




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.                             14717 of 2019

                      =====================================================
                                       SIDDHARTH MONAL SHAH
                                               Versus
                                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      =====================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR AMIT V THAKKAR(3073) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                      MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI(6251) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                      MR ADITYA DAVDA ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
                      Respondent - State
                      NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      =====================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                                                       Date : 16/01/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has

prayed for the following reliefs :-

"A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any appropriate writ order or direction, directing the respondents to return the original documents/mark-sheets/certificates of the petitioner submitted at the time of seeking admission for M.S. course with the respondent no.2 college/institute and also be pleased to direct the respondents to refund the fees of Rs.10 lacs paid/deposited at the time of seeking admission for M.S. course with the respondent no.2 college/institute;

B) Pending admission, hearing and final

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondents to return the original documents/mark-

sheets/certificates of the petitioner submitted at the time of seeking admission for M.S. course with the respondent no.2 college/institute and also be pleased to direct the respondents to refund the fees of Rs.10 lacs paid/deposited at the time of seeking admission for M.S. course with the respondent no.2 college/institute;

C) Your Lordships may be pleased to pass such other order that may be just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners."

2. On 22.10.2019, this Court had passed the

following order :-

"1. RULE returnable on 09.12.2019.

2. For the purposes of interim relief, the limited question today for consideration is whether, pending the petition, the petitioner's documents which he tendered at the time of admission, ought to be returned to him so that he can think of pursuing his course of Master of Surgery or any other course that he wishes to, from the next academic session, fully being aware of the fact that he will lose one year. The larger issue whether the fees can be refunded of a candidate who has withdrawn himself from pursuing the course of Master of Surgery, shall be considered at the time of final hearing.

3. Short facts of the case are that the petitioner opted for being admitted to a course of Master of Surgery with the respondent institute. At the time of admission, a sum of Rs.10 lakh was paid as

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

fees towards first semester by the petitioner. He joined the college on 08.05.2019. It is his case in the petition that he was alloted emergency unit continuously without break and he faced ragging at the hands of his seniors. Traumatized by this experience, he left the course midway and did not attend the college. It is in this background of facts that the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer twofold viz. the return of documents and refund of fees.

4. Mr.Amit Thakkar learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that from the reading of the notice given by the petitioner's advocate, it is apparent that because of the trauma suffered by the student due to ragging to him at the hands of his seniors, the petitioner-student left the course.

5. On issuance of notice, Mr.Anuj Trivedi learned counsel for the institute has filed affidavit in reply. Preliminary contention is raised as to maintainability of the petition. On merits, it is contended by learned counsel Mr.Trivedi that in view of Rule 13 of the Admission Rules, no fees can be refunded. Rule 13 of the Admission Rules reads as under:

"13. No Admission on Vacant Seats after Specific Date.-

Admission shall be granted in any Professional Post-graduate medical educational colleges or institutions on or before the date specified by concerned council for the concerned admission year. No admission shall be granted on the vacant seats after the said date."

6. From the aforesaid rule, it is evident

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

that in the event the student withdraws midway and the seat cannot be filled in, institute suffers heavy losses because of having lost that seat. Since the petitioner has paid Rs.10 lakh as fees, in consonance with the resolution dated 22.08.2019, unless and until the student pays half of the fees of the remaining full course; which amount in this case is Rs.25 lakhs, the original documents of the student cannot be released.

7. Mr.Amit Thakkar learned counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of this Court to the admission rules dated 13.03.2018. Reliance is placed on Rule 15(iii)(b) thereof which reads as under:

" 15. Cancellation of Admission and Refund of Fee.-

(iii)(b) In case of a candidate withdrawing his candidature after completion of admission process, for any reason whatsoever, he may request in writing to the college or institution in which he is granted admission, for refund of fee paid by him. In such case the fee may be refunded, by such college or institution."

8. Mr.Trivedi relies on a judgment in case of Sanjat Suman Lenka, Son of Bibhuti Bhusan Lenka v. Medical Council of India and Others reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Kar 1275 of Karnataka High Court and relies specifically on para 53 and 54 thereof. This Court is not in agreement with the view because the judgment would be applicable only in cases where there are no rules. In the present case, as it is evident from the Rule 15(iii)(b) reproduced herein above, asking the petitioner to give a bond would tantamount

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

indirectly to compel him to pay fees.

9. What is evident from the reading of the Rule therefore is in case of the candidate withdrawing his candidature for any reason whatsoever and if a request is so made to the college, the college can consider the refund of fee to the student. This however shall be decided finally at the time of final hearing. Today, prima-facie the contention that unless and until the outstanding amount of Rs.25 lakhs i.e. half of the amount of full fees is deposited before the respondent institute, the documents shall not be returned to the student, deserves to be rejected for the following reasons.

10. The circumstances under which the petitioner is compelled to withdraw from the course indicate that he was harassed by his seniors. Pleadings in the petition indicate that he was traumatized and therefore could not attend his course. Once having found himself in such a situation and having approached this Court, to ask the petitioner to deposit as an interim measure Rs.25 lakhs and only then return documents would be highly prejudicial to his future academic pursuits.

11. The anxiety today is that the schedule of examination of NEET and other procedure would start for the petitioner to enable to start afresh.

12. By way of interim order, therefore, the following documents are directed to be released by the institute to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The documents are as under:

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

 Allotment Letter of ACPPGMEC  Tuition Fee Receipt  All Year MBBS Marksheets Of SMT. N.H.L. MUNICIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, AHMEDABAD  12 months Internship completion certificate of Institute/University  Copy of NEET - 2019 Marksheet  Provisional Registration of Gujarat Medical Council / Gujarat Dental Council OR Medical Council of India (In case of fresh candidates only who have just completed their internship)/Permanent registration of Gujarat Medical Council / Gujarat Dental Council OR Medical Council of India (In case of old pass out candidates)  Document showing place of birth & Date of Birth & Indian Citizenship (School leaving Certificate / Transfer Certificate / Passport / Birth Certificate)  Candidate has to bring Envelope Size (11 x 15 inch)

13. Direct service of this order is permitted.

3. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated

22.10.2019 in the present petition, the

respondent No.2 has returned all the original

documents/mark-sheets/certificates to the

petitioner. In view thereof, the grievance of

the petitioner stands addressed and satisfied.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

4. With regard to the second part of the relief,

i.e. " direct the respondents to refund the fees

of Rs. 10 lacs paid/deposited at the time of

seeking admission for M.S. course with the

respondent no.2 college/institute" it was stated

on instructions by learned advocate Mr. Amit

Thakkar that the petitioner does not desire to

press for or seek the said relief. The

petitioner no longer seeks refund of any fees or

amounts deposited with the respondent no.2 and

upon instructions from the petitioner, it was

further stated that he would not initiate or

pursue any proceedings in future as well. It was

also stated, upon instructions, by learned

advocate Mr. Amit Thakkar that the petitioner

hereby waives his right to seek the refund of

any amount paid to the respondent No.2.

5. In view of above background and submissions made

by learned advocate Mr. Amit Thakkar, learned

advocate Mr. Anuj Trivedi appearing for the

respondent No.2, upon instructions submitted

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

that in view of peculiar facts and circumstances

of the present case, the respondent No.2 shall

not apply the resolution dated 22.8.2019 of the

executive committee for recovering half of the

balance fee of the full course in the case of

present petitioner. Upon instructions, learned

advocate Mr. Anuj Trivedi further submitted that

the amount already been paid by the petitioner

shall remain with respondent No.2 as academic

year is already over and the petitioner was

enrolled with respondent No.2 in the said

academic year. The respondent No.2 states that

it would not initiate or pursue any proceedings

to seek the balance fees of the course from the

petitioner in future as well and the aforesaid

statement was made by learned advocate Mr. Anuj

Trivedi upon instructions from the respondent

No.2.

6. In light of the above, as no grievance remains

between the parties, the petition stands

disposed of in view of the above submissions of

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/14717/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2025

undefined

the parties. The aforesaid is in the peculiar

facts and circumstances of the present case and

the same shall not be treated as a precedent.

7. In view of above consensus arrived at between

the parties, petition is disposed of. Rule is

discharged. No order as to costs.

(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)

Pallavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter