Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3341 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/1879/2010 ORDER DATED: 24/02/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1879 of 2010
==========================================================
NARANBHAI SAVDASBHAI MOKARIYA
Versus
PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED THRU ITS DEPUTY ENGINEER
VIDE HONBLE COURTS ORDER DTD 30072024
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAV C THAKKAR(2206) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR CHINMAY M GANDHI(3979) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
MS RUMI M GANDHI(3472) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 24/02/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocates appearing for the respective parties have
jointly placed on record the order dated 21.12.2024 passed below
Exh.1 in execution proceedings being Execution Application No.23 of
2010, whereby the learned Judge has disposed of the execution
proceedings on the ground of settlement entered upon between the
parties to the proceedings. Learned advocates, therefore, urged this
Court that the present appeal arising out of the same impugned
judgment and order, which was sought to be executed in the
execution proceedings, does not survive.
2. Mr. Nirav C. Thakkar, learned advocate on record for the
appellant, seeks permission of this Court for refund of the court fees,
which is deposited at the time of registration of first appeal.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned advocates for the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/1879/2010 ORDER DATED: 24/02/2025
undefined
respective parties and noticing the order dated 21.12.2024 passed by
learned 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Porbandar in
executing proceedings being Execution Application No.23 of 2010,
whereby the impugned judgment and order dated 21.12.2009 passed
by learned 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate First
Class, Porbandar in Special Civil Suit No.74 of 2002 was sought to be
executed, the parties to the proceedings have entered into the
settlement agreement.
4. In view of the settlement agreement entered upon between the
parties as recorded by the learned Judge, the present appeal does not
survive. Hence, the present appeal stands disposed of, in view of the
settlement.
5. Noticing the fact the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat
in the execution proceedings, Registry is directed to examine the
aforesaid issue and to pass appropriate orders in this regard. The
appellant is permitted to apply for refund of the court fees before the
Registry of this court.
6. Registry is directed to send back the record and proceedings to
the concerned court forthwith.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!