Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sagarbhai Laxmanbhai Jejaria vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 3190 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3190 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Sagarbhai Laxmanbhai Jejaria vs State Of Gujarat on 19 February, 2025

                                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.RA/563/2009                               ORDER DATED: 19/02/2025

                                                                                                           undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                   R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 563 of 2009
                       ==========================================================
                                                SAGARBHAI LAXMANBHAI JEJARIA
                                                            Versus
                                                     STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR PS CHAMPANERI(214) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR.TRUPESH KATHIRIYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================
                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY

                                                        Date : 19/02/2025

                                                         ORAL ORDER

1. By way of filing the present application under Section 397

read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the applicant

- convict seeks acquittal by setting aside the judgment and order

of conviction and sentence dated 25.01.2007 passed in Criminal

Case No. 457 of 2006 by the learned 2nd Additional Civil Judge &

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Surendranagar as well as judgement

and order dated 03.09.2009 in Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 2007 by

the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court,

Surendranagar.

2. By the aforesaid appellate judgement and order of conviction

and sentence, the Revision applicant came to be held guilty and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/563/2009 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2025

undefined

convicted for the offences punishable under sections 185 of the

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and under Section 66(1)(A) and Section

66(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and consequently he

had been ordered to undergo sentence as under:-

Section under Imprisonment Fine (Amount) In default of payment of fine Section 185 of SI for three Rs.500/- SI for 15 days M.V.Act months Section 66(1) SI for six Rs.500/- SI for 15 days (A) of Bombay months Prohibition Act,

Section 66(B) SI for three Rs.250/- SI for 7 days of Bombay months Prohibition Act,

3. Learned Advocate Mr.P.S.Champaneri for the applicant

submits that the incident is of the year 2006 and the applicant has

already paid the fines. The said fact is also confirmed by the learned

APP Mr. Kathiriya. According to Mr. Champaneri, learned advocate,

given the triviality of the offence and the long passage of time, no

useful purpose will be served in sending the applicant back to jail.

He has therefore requested to this Court that the suspension may be

allowed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/563/2009 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2025

undefined

4. Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya, learned APP for the respondent - State

however opposes the submissions made by the learned advocate for

the applicant and stating that irrespective of passage of time the

applicant must serve out the entire sentence. He has therefore,

requested this Court to dismiss the present application.

5. This Court however, is of the view that since the incident is of

the year 2006 and the applicant has already spent some time in jail

before he came to be released by this Court vide order dated

11.9.2009, the interests of justice will be sub-served if the conviction

of the applicant is sustained. However, the sentence is reduced to

already undergone inasmuch as after long period of time if the

applicant is sent back to jail for an offence, which is not so grave in

the eyes of this Court, there would be more harm caused to the

society than the benefit that has been accrued in letting the present

situation stand since 2009. The revision application has already

been admitted by this Court on 18.03.2010. Hence, the prayer made

by the applicant in the present application requires consideration.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/563/2009 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2025

undefined

Consequently, the present application stands allowed to the extent

that the conviction is maintained. The applicant's sentence,

however, for the offences punishable under sections 185 of the

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, under Section 66(1)(A) and Section

66(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 is reduced to the period

already undergone. Bail bond if any, stands cancelled. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

(D.N.RAY,J) BINA SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter