Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramabhai Rameshbhai Surela vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 3034 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3034 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Ramabhai Rameshbhai Surela vs State Of Gujarat on 13 February, 2025

                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.A/2359/2024                                  ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                             R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 2359 of 2024
                       ==========================================================
                                    RAMABHAI RAMESHBHAI SURELA & ANR.
                                                      Versus
                                           STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MS TANAVEER K LOLADIA(9994) for the appellants(s) No. 1,2
                       NOTICE SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
                       MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================
                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                           Date : 13/02/2025
                                                            ORAL ORDER

[1.0] ADMIT. Learned APP waives service of notice of Admission for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 - State of Gujarat.

[2.0] Present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "Atrocity Act") challenging the judgment and order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar in Criminal Misc. Application No.758 of 2024 whereby the learned Judge rejected the application filed by the present appellants under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11211009240470 of 2024 registered with Chotila Police Station, District Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 108, 115(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short "BNS") and section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short "Atrocity Act").

[3.0] Learned advocate for the appellants submitted that the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/2359/2024 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025

undefined

appellants are not involved in the commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely enroped in the offence. Further, charge- sheet is filed and nothing is required to be recovered or discovered from the present appellants and appellants are not having any past antecedent. Further, the appellants are behind the bars since 09.07.2024 and therefore, the appellants are required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions.

[4.0] Per contra, learned APP appearing for the respondent No.1 - State as well as learned advocate Mr. Munjal Acharya for the original complainant have vehemently opposed the present appeal and stated that if the appellants are released on bail then the possibility of tampering with the evidence cannot be ruled out. Further, as sufficient material and evidence is collected during the investigation, appellants are not entitled to any relief from this Court and hence, have requested to dismiss the present appeal.

[5.0] I have given thoughtful consideration to the arguments canvassed by learned advocates for both the sides.

The allegation in the FIR is that alleged incident took place on 08.07.2024 wherein it is alleged that accused persons used to quarrel with the deceased due to which the deceased committed suicide in the temple of Goddess Meldi Maa and in this regard, complaint came to be filed. However, there is no any suicide note or any direct evidence qua instigation on the part of appellants is collected during the investigation. Further, it is pertinent to note that investigation is over and nothing is required to be recovered or discovered from the present appellants as the charge-sheet is filed. In view of the above, if the appellants are not released on bail then it will be pre-trial conviction and considering the principle of bail is rule and jail is

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/2359/2024 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025

undefined

exception, present appeal deserves consideration with appropriate conditions. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2012)1 SCC 40. This Court has also taken into consideration the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahendra Awase vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2025 INSC 76 as well as in the case of Ayyub & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another reported in 2025 INSC

[6.0] Hence, the present appeal is allowed. The appellants are ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11211009240470 of 2024 registered with Chotila Police Station, District Surendranagar on executing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that the appellants shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the India without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

[e] mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the concerned trial court;






                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.A/2359/2024                                ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025

                                                                                                             undefined




[7.0] The authorities shall release the appellants only if the appellants are not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

[8.0] At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order. Direct service is permitted.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

Ajay

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter