Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2517 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/379/2024 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 379 of
2024
In
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2926 of 2025
================================================================
BADALKUMAR SADANAND MANDAL
Versus
SONI W/O BADALKUMAR SADANAND MANDAL
================================================================
Appearance:
MR. RAAJEN D JADHAV(10026) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
Date : 12/08/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
1. This application is filed by the applicant-husband under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 43 days
in preferring the appeal against judgment and decree dated
18.03.2023 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Surat in
Family Suit No.465 of 2020.
2. Rule was issued on 25.01.2024 returnable on
12.03.2024. None has filed appearance so far for the respondent.
3. Learned advocate has drawn attention of this Court to
the contents of para-2 of the application, wherein it stated that the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/379/2024 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2025
undefined
applicant had to seek financial help from friends and other persons
as he is doing casual work and hence, some delay has occurred.
5. Considering the aforesaid, particularly, period of 43
days of delay, the Court is of the view that considering the facts
involved in the case, delay cannot be treated as inordinate.
6. Considering the submissions and the contents of the
application mentioned hereinabove, the delay is also explained
sufficiently.
7. A reference in this regard may be made to the
judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Sheo Raj Singh
(Deceased) through Legal Representatives and others vs/. Union of
India and Another, reported in, (2023) 10 SCC 531, wherein the
term "Sufficient Cause" was interpreted and the approach of
Courts while deciding application for condonation of delay was
discussed.
8. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. The
delay of 43 is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
(NSSG,J) SHITOLE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!