Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2511 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/1349/2025 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY)
NO. 1349 of 2025
In
F/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 1245 of 2022
======================================
BABUBHAI BHAGVANBHAI SANKHAT & ORS.
Versus
PRAMOD KUMAR MAHADEVA PRASAD & ORS.
======================================
Appearance:
MR.HIREN M MODI(3732) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
DESHAL A MODI(12518) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 12/08/2025
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicants. Learned
advocate for the respective respondent nos.2 and 3 are not
present. Rule issued by this Court remained unserved qua the
respondent no.1 being driver of the vehicle involved in the
accident.
Considering the limited prayer sought for and main
appeal preferred by the respondent no.3 - insurance company
has been admitted, present application is taken-up for hearing
in absence of the respondents.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/1349/2025 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2025
undefined
Learned advocate for the applicants mainly relied upon
the averments made in the application and has submitted that
the applicants were unable to approach this Court within
stipulated period of limitation because of the pandemic. At
the same time, the applicants have to manage funds to prefer
the cross-objection. Learned advocate has therefore urged
this Court to take liberal approach and condone the delay.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned
advocate for the applicants and the same being deposed on
oath, in absence of any contradiction being pointed-out by the
respondents, this Court is inclined to accept the aforesaid
explanation as sufficient cause for present applicants to
unable to approach this Court within the stipulated period of
limitation. Further, noticing the fact that main appeal
assailing the same impugned judgment and award filed by the
respondent no.3 - insurance company is admitted and the
same is pending consideration, this Court is inclined to
exercise discretion in favour of the present applicants.
Hence, present application stands allowed. The delay caused
in preferring the cross-objection is hereby condoned.
(NISHA M. THAKORE, J.) AMAR RATHOD...
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!