Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karansingh Makhansinh Chauhan ... vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 2338 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2338 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Karansingh Makhansinh Chauhan ... vs State Of Gujarat on 7 August, 2025

                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.RA/899/2025                                   ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
                                 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 899 of 2025

                                                   With
                      CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE) NO.
                                                 1 of 2025
                            In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 899 of 2025
                      ==========================================================
                             KARANSINGH MAKHANSINH CHAUHAN DIRECTOR OF INFRA
                                           TOLLYWAY PVT. LTD.
                                                  Versus
                                         STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR. JAVED S QURESHI(6999) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR. NIRAJ SHARMA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA

                                                           Date : 07/08/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1) Rule. Learned APP waives service on behalf of the

Respondent - State.

2) When the matter is called out, learned advocate Mr.

Wasim M. Pathan stated that he has instructions to

appear on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 - Original

Complainant. It is submitted that the present matter has

been amicably settled between the parties and the

cheque amount has already been received. Further, it is

submitted that the original complainant has filed his

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/899/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025

undefined

affidavit on record and also confirmed the fact that the

cheque payment has already been paid and he has no

objection, if conviction passed by the learned Trial Court

is set aside.

3) Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the

learned Trial Court has convicted the present applicant

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

1881 and thereafter, the appeal has not been preferred

by the present applicant before the learned District

Court. However, directly, he has filed his revision

application before this Hon'ble Court and submitted that

the matter has been amicably settled between the

parties. Further, he has put reliance upon the order

passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court that in the

revision application, the order of the learned Trial Court

can be challenged if it has been amicably settled

between the parties.

4) Considering the fact that the present accused is

convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881 with compoundable offence and

the matter is amicably settled between the parties, the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/899/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025

undefined

judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate,

First Class, Matar in Criminal Case No.196 of 2022

dated 29.04.2025, convicting the present applicant

original accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced the present

applicant to 2 years simple imprisonment is hereby

quashed and set aside. The present applicant - original

accused is hereby acquitted from all the charges and his

bail bond stands cancelled accordingly.

5) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in

the case of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H.

reported in AIR 2010 SC (1907), the applicant has to pay

5% of the cheque amount before the Gujarat State Legal

Service Authority within a period of 3 weeks.

6) The present Criminal Misc. Application is disposed of

accordingly.

7) Rule is made absolute. Direct Service is permitted.

(L. S. PIRZADA, J) JCP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter