Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sidsar Group Agricultural Service ... vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 5957 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5957 Guj
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Sidsar Group Agricultural Service ... vs State Of Gujarat on 22 April, 2025

Author: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
                                                                                                                    NEUTRAL CITATION




                            C/SCA/3229/2025                                         ORDER DATED: 22/04/2025

                                                                                                                    undefined




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                                 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3229 of 2025
                      ===================================================
                          SIDSAR GROUP AGRICULTURAL SERVICE COOPERATIVE
                                              SOCIETY LTD.
                                                  Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                      ===================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR TULSHI R SAVANI(3070) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                      MR. AAKASH GUPTA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
                      MR. B.B. NAIK, Senior Counsel assisted by MR UMANG R
                      VYAS(5595) for the Respondent(s) No. 4, 5
                      ===================================================
                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI

                                                        Date : 22/04/2025

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Tulshi R. Savani, learned advocate

appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Aakash Gupta, learned Assistant

Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 -

State and Mr. B.B. Naik, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.

Umang R. Vyas, learned advocate appearing for the respondent

nos. 4 and 5, on caveat.

2. By way of the present petition, petitioner herein has

prayed for the following reliefs:

"15. Therefore, the petitioner prays to your Lordships that:

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/3229/2025 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2025

undefined

(A) Be pleased to allow present petition.

(B) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by quashing and setting aside the recruitment process commencing by advertisement dated 23.01.2025 Ann 'B' published by respondent nos. 4 and 6 by inviting applications for appointment of 80 clerks as the said advertisement is against the rules of recruitment framed in view of the judgment dated 30.10.2017 Ann 'C' passed by this Hon'ble Court in SCA Nos. 6430 of 1997 and 9575 of 2006 and also against the provisions of the Gujarat Co - operative Societies Act,

(C) Be pleased to pass appropriate order or direction by directing respondent nos. 1 to 3 by taking appropriate actions in view of representation dated 03.02.2025 annexed at Annexure - A against illegal recruitment process and against the people who are involved in the illegal recruitment.

(D) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of present petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the recruitment process initiated in view of advertisement dated 23.01.2025 along with further proceedings in respect to advertisement dated 23.01.2025 which is annexed at Annexure - B to this petition.

(E) Such other and further relief or relieves as may be deemed just and expedient in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted."

3. The petitioner herein is a member society of the

respondent no.4 and is aggrieved by the recruitment process

undertaken by the respondent no.4. Mr. Savani, learned advocate

appearing for the petitioner relies on the representation made to

the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and submits that the grievance

raised in the said representation before the competent authority

is not redressed. It is submitted that the impugned advertisement

issued by the respondent nos.4 and 6 dated 23.01.2025, duly

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/3229/2025 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2025

undefined

produced at Annexure-B, by inviting applications for appointment

of 80 Clerks, is contrary to the Recruitment Rules framed in view

of the judgment dated 30.10.2017 passed by the High Court in

SCA Nos. 6430 of 1997 and 9575 of 2006, duly produced at

Annexure-C and against the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative

Societies Act, 1961.

4. Mr. B.B. Naik, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.

Umang R. Vyas, learned advocate appearing for the respondent

nos. 4 and 5 submits that the petitioner be relegated to avail the

alternative remedy under Section 92(1) of the Gujarat Cooperative

Societies Act, 1961, which provides for redressal of the dispute

between the member and society.

5. Mr. Aakash Gupta, learned Assistant Government

Pleader appearing for the respondent- State has placed on record

the order passed by the respondent no.2 herein dated 13.03.2025

being No. RCOS/0569/03/2025, initiating the inquiry against the

respondent no.4 under Section 86 of the Act. It is submitted that,

the grievance of the petitioner otherwise would be redressed,

when such inquiry is undertaken by the competent authority.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/3229/2025 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2025

undefined

6. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner's

Representation dated 03.02.2025 duly produced at Annexure-A,

be considered by the respondent no.2 in accordance with the

Recruitment Rules, which are framed by the respondent no.4

Bank and in accordance with the Gujarat Cooperative Societies

Act. It is open for the respondent no.2 either to decide the said

representation independently or consolidate the same with the

inquiry undertaken under Section 86 of the Gujarat Cooperative

Societies Act. The aforesaid Representation be decided, preferably

within a period of two weeks from the copy of the receipt of the

order.

7. This Court has otherwise not opined on the merits of

the matter.

8. It is kept open for the petitioner herein to approach

this Court in case of any difficulty.

9. The present Petition stands disposed of. Direct service

is permitted.

(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) Pradhyuman

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter