Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Narmada Khand Udyog Sahkari Mandli ... vs State Of Gujarat
2024 Latest Caselaw 4981 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4981 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2024

Gujarat High Court

The Narmada Khand Udyog Sahkari Mandli ... vs State Of Gujarat on 19 June, 2024

                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




   R/CR.MA/9915/2024                                       ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

                                                                                         undefined




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 9915 of
                             2024
             In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1284 of 2024
                             With
               R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1284 of 2024
==========================================================
     THE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDLI THROUGH
          MOHAMMMADIJAZ SULTANMOHAMMAD DAYMA
                          Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR APURVA R KAPADIA(5012) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. DIVYANG A RAMANI(7180) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR JAY MEHTA, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

                                 Date : 19/06/2024

                        ORAL ORDER

ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 9915 of 2024

1. Learned advocate Mr.Apurva Kapadia submits that the judgment and order of the acquittal was passed by the learned trial Court mainly on the ground that the complainant has not offered himself for cross examination and therefore, stage of cross examination of the complainant was closed by passing an order below Exhibit 28 and in absence of the cross examination, chief examination would not have any evidentiary value. Learned advocate Mr.Kapadia submits that due to absence of the respondent-accused, the complainant has filed an application below Exhibit 28 on 19.07.2023 to close the stage of the cross examination of the complainant by the respondent-accused. Learned

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9915/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

advocate Mr.Kapadia submits that the said application was decided and the same was rejected by the learned trial Court vide order dated 06.09.2023 however, the stage of the cross examination was closed as the complainant was not present on that day.

2. Learned advocate Mr.Kapadia submits that being aggrieved by the aforesaid order the complainant has preferred the Revision Application before the learned Sessions Court wherein the learned Sessions Court has rejected the said application on the ground that, closing the stage of the cross examination of the complainant would not cause injustice as the evidence, which shows exhibited through the chief examination has not been discarded by the learned trial Court.

3. Learned advocate Mr.Kapadia has drawn the attention of this Court from the rojkaam, wherein it transpires that on number occasions the respondent-accused was absent as well as the complainant was also not present on every date. Learned advocate Mr.Kapadia submits that though the stage of the further statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was closed by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2023, the further statement was recorded on next date of hearing i.e. on 06.10.2023 by the learned trial Court and there was no any reference with regard to any application for opening the stage for further statement filed by the respondent-accused.

4. Learned advocate Mr.Kapadia submits that due to non- appreciation of the evidence, which was placed by the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9915/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

complainant with the chief examination, gross injustice was caused and therefore, the matter is required to be remanded back to the learned trial Court.

5. Considering the submissions, this Court deems it fit to allow this application for seeking leave to prefer an appeal. Hence, present application is allowed. Leave to prefer an appeal is granted.

ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1284 of 2024

1. The appeal is admitted.

2. Let Notice for final disposal be issued, making it returnable on 01.07.2024. Learned APP Mr.Mehta waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State as well as learned advocate Mr.Divyang Ramani waives service of notice of admission on behalf of respondent- accused.

3. Record and Proceedings shall be called for, so as to reach before this Court on or before the returnable date.

(M. K. THAKKER,J) M.M.MIRZA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter