Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Bhogilal Jadavjibhai ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7069 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7069 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2023

Gujarat High Court
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Bhogilal Jadavjibhai ... on 25 September, 2023
Bench: Ilesh J. Vora
                                                                                    NEUTRAL CITATION




       C/FA/153/2009                                ORDER DATED: 25/09/2023

                                                                                     undefined




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 of 2009

==========================================================
                   NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
                              Versus
           BHOGILAL JADAVJIBHAI MISTRI(SUTHAR) & 4 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
for the Defendant(s) No. 4,5
MR MOHSIN M HAKIM(5396) for the Defendant(s) No. 2,3
SERVED BY AFFIX. (R) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                              Date : 25/09/2023

                               ORAL ORDER

1. This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd, assailing the judgment and award dated 04.08.2008 in Claim Petition No. 794 of 1994 passed by the Claim Tribunal at Vadodara.

2. Deceased Dharmesh Bhogilal aged about 24 years old met with an accident on 11.03.1999, when, the bike upon which he was riding dashed with the involved truck, as a result, the deceased as well as two other persons succumbed to their injuries in the hospital. The respondents original claimant herein had filed the above claim petition before the Tribunal at Vadodara claiming compensation an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- against the offending truck and its insurance company. The Tribunal, after considering the avocation of the deceased, determined Rs.7000/- monthly income and after

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/153/2009 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2023

undefined

deducting 1/3rd from it, and applying multiplier of 14, awarded Rs.7,84,056/- under the head of dependency loss and in addition to that, an amount of Rs.25,000/- awarded under the conventional head.

3. The Insurance Company, the appellant herein, being dissatisfied with the said judgment and award has preferred present appeal, inter-alia, stating that, the award is excessive and on higher side and without any evidence of the income, the Tribunal, assesses monthly Rs.7000/- which the Tribunal could not have determined.

4. Mr. M.G. Majmudar, learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has stated that, the Tribunal has materially erred in awarding the amount of compensation as there is no evidence adduced by the respondent so far income of the deceased is concerned and therefore, the amount is excessive and requires modification by this Court.

5. Though served, none is appearing for the respondent claimant.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on perusal of the material placed on record, the issue arises for determination is to whether the impugned judgment and award is excessive and requires reduction?

7. The factum of accident and the other issues like age, number of legal heirs are not in dispute. The deceased was in a field of making furniture as well as doing fall ceiling work. Generally, for

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/153/2009 ORDER DATED: 25/09/2023

undefined

such kind of works, it is difficult for the legal heirs of the deceased to obtain the proof of the income and therefore, the job of the Tribunal is to determine a just compensation keeping in mind the reality of the society. In such circumstances, the Tribunal has not committed any error while determining the monthly income of Rs.7000/-. Considering the case of Sarla Verma, the Constitutional Bench of the Apex Court in a case of Pranay Shathi, laid down the criteria for deciding the dependency loss. If we compare the criteria laid down in case of Pranay Shathi, then the award is on lower side. Thus, therefore, this Court is satisfied that the impugned judgment and award is just, equitable and reasonable. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed being devoid of any merits. The award passed by the Tribunal is upheld. The amount lying with the Tribunal shall disburse to the respondent claimants immediately. Decree be drawn accordingly.

(ILESH J. VORA,J) P.S. JOSHI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter