Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6803 Guj
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/4675/2019 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4675 of 2019
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019
In
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4675 of 2019
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4676 of 2019
=======================================================
BHAVINKUMAR JAYANTILAL PARMAR
Versus
DIPTIBEN KANTIBHAI DABHI
=======================================================
Appearance:
DARSHIT R BRAHMBHATT(8011) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR.SHASHIKANT PARMAR(6346) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
=======================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH SHASTRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Date : 14/09/2023
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI)
1. First Appeal No.4675/2019 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nadiad in Family Suit No.113/2018, by which, the suit filed by the respondent - wife seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act has been allowed.
2. First Appeal No.4676/2019 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nadiad in Family Suit No.128/2018, by which, the suit filed by the appellant - husband seeking divorce under
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/4675/2019 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2023
undefined
Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act has been rejected.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned advocates appearing for the parties have tendered copies of settlement agreement/ full and final settlement executed between the appellant - husband and the respondent - wife duly signed and notarized as well as affidavit sworn by the respondent - wife and submitted that amicable settlement has been arrived at by and between the parties and they have decided to put an end to the proceeding pending between the parties. It is submitted by both the parties that the respondent
- wife has given her consent that if the aforesaid appeals are allowed, she has no objection. It is, therefore, urged that both these appeals may be allowed in terms of settlement arrived at by and between the parties.
4. We have heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. We have also heard the appellant - husband and the respondent - wife present before this Court, who have been identified by their respective learned advocates. Upon making inquiry from them, they have admitted about the settlement arrived at by and between the parties. Further as stated above, the settlement arrived at by and between the parties has been reduced into writing, duly signed by the parties and notarized. Therefore, both these appeal deserve to be allowed.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/4675/2019 ORDER DATED: 14/09/2023
undefined
5. In view of the aforesaid facts, we need not now adjudicate the aforesaid first appeals on merits. Accordingly, both first appeals stands allowed and the impugned judgment and decrees therein are also hereby quashed and set aside. The marriage between the parties stands dissolved in accordance with the terms of agreement reduced into writing, duly signed by the parties and notarized. The parties are directed to abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement deed. Registry shall now draw the decree of dissolution of marriage in accordance with the terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties .
6. Connected civil application stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, J.)
Sd/-
(DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.) Gautam
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!