Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7361 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/14526/2023 ORDER DATED: 05/10/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 14526
of 2023
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2282 of 2023
With
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2282 of 2023
==========================================================
A D UDVANI (ANAND DINESH UDWANI)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SAVAN N PANDYA(5600) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NISHIDHKUMAR M PATEL(8335) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS DIVYANGNA JHALA, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER
Date : 05/10/2023
ORAL ORDER
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 14526 of 2023
1. This is an application preferred by the applicant-original
complainant under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, seeking leave of this Court to present an
appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated
19.11.2022, passed by the learned 4th Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Gandhidham in Criminal Case No.1493 of 2016.
2. Learned advocate Mr.Jay Shah for learned advocate
Mr.Savan Pandya submits that the learned Court had passed
an order under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, on the ground that the complainant is remaining absent.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/14526/2023 ORDER DATED: 05/10/2023
undefined
Learned advocate had relied on the rojkaam, wherein it
transpires that on 03.08.2022 the advocates from both the
sides were present and the matter was kept on 05.09.2022.
Again, on 05.09.2022 advocate of the accused was absent and
the complainant's advocate was present, the matter was
adjourned on 06.10.2022. On 06.10.2022 the Court was on
leave therefore, the matter was kept on 03.11.2022. On
03.11.2022 there was no any presence recorded in the
rojkaam of the advocate of the complainant. However, it is
mentioned that advocate of the accused was present and the
matter was kept on 19.11.2022. The impugned order was
passed on 19.11.2022. The learned advocate submits that on
19.11.2022 he was not remained present. He further submits
that the complaint was filed by the Food Safety Officer,
Gandhidham Nagarpalika. Due to inadvertent mistake, neither
the complainant nor his advocate remained present. Learned
advocate further submits that he undertakes that if this order
is quashed and the matter is remanded back to the learned
Court, he would not seek any unnecessary adjournment.
2. Considering the averments made in the application and
submissions made by the learned advocate appearing for the
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/14526/2023 ORDER DATED: 05/10/2023
undefined
applicant, there is some arguable case in favour of the
applicant, leave, as prayed for, is granted. This application is
allowed. Present application stands disposed of.
ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2282 of 2023
1. Issue Notice, returnable on 26.10.2023. Learned APP
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent-State.
2. Let R & P be called for, so as to reach before this Court on
or before the returnable date.
(M. K. THAKKER,J) M.M.MIRZA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!