Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2491 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2023
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19649 of 2022
==========================================================
SHAKANBHAI BIJIYABHAI MANDOD
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 24/03/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. The claimants are before this Court
challenging the order dated 13.7.2021 passed
below Exh.9 in MACMA no.57 of 2020, where
the prayer came to be rejected, wherein it
was urged that the compensation amount be
put in fixed deposit in Baroda Gujarat
Gramin Bank.
2. Mr. Bhalodi, learned advocate for the
applicants submits that the applicants are
holding a savings account in Baroda Gujarat
Gramin Bank and therefore, they had made a
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
prayer to pass necessary order of putting
the amount in the fixed deposit at the Bank,
where the claimants hold their savings
account. Mr. Bhalodi submits that the
learned Tribunal, while passing the judgment
and award, had made a direction to place the
amount in a nationalized Bank. Mr. Bhalodi
states that the applicants - claimants are
from the tribal area and they would have
their savings account in the Banks which
would be convenient for their banking
transaction as well as from the place of
residence.
3. Mr. Bhalodi further stated that Baroda
Gujarat Gramin Bank is at par with the
nationalized Bank and there is nothing on
record or in public domain to suggest that
there would be any risk of putting the
amount in the said Bank and a communication
was addressed by the Regional Manager of
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank on 24.9.2019 to
the learned Principal District Judge with
the subject of classification of Baroda
Gujarat Gramin Bank. In the said letter, it
is stated that all the Regional Rural Banks
are listed in the 2nd schedule and are
classified as "Scheduled Banks" under
Section 42 and 2(e) of RBI Act, 1934 as they
were established under the Regional Rural
Bank Act, 1976. Mr. Bhalodi, thus, stated
that as per the communication, Baroda
Gujarat Gramin Bank is owned by Government
of India, Government of Gujarat and Bank of
Baroda in the ratio of 50:15:35 and 65% of
Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank is directly owned
by Central and State Government and thus,
stated that the rejection of the application
would be an infringement of the personal
right of the applicants and is inconsistent
with the general practice of the Court. The
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
learned Tribunal had passed the order of
depositing the money in the nationalized
Bank as per the application in many of the
MACP matters, the amount was deposited in
Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank and by mere
observation of non-compliance, without any
evidence on record, the learned Tribunal, on
its own, has made certain observations
against the Bank while the communication of
the Bank to the learned Principal District
Judge shows the holding of the Government of
Gujarat as well as Central Government and
Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank. Further, the
communication from the Ministry of Finance,
Government of India, Department of Financial
Services, New Delhi dated 8.5.2014 shows
that the Regional Rural Banks established
under the provisions of the RRBs Act, 1976
is with the objective of an alternatvie
channel to cooperative credit structure
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
which has played a crucial role in meeting
the credit needs of the rural areas and
implementation of Financial Inclusion Scheme
of the Government of India. The applicants
from rural area would certainly prefer their
money to be invested in the Banks which is
owned with the object of developing the
cooperative credit structure and therefore,
the learned Tribunal ought to have granted
the application. The observation so made
with regard to the Bank could not be
conducive even to the Bank concerned since
nothing has been brought on record by way of
report of any of the Government authority of
any non-compliance of the rules and
regulations. Thus, for the reasons noted
hereinabove, the order dated 13.7.2021
passed below Exh.9 in MACMA no.57 of 2020 is
quashed and set aside. Let the amount be
placed in Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank, where
C/SCA/19649/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2023
the claimants hold their savings account.
4. Accordingly, the present petition stands
disposed of. Direct service is permitted.
(GITA GOPI,J) Maulik
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!