Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2151 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2023
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3850 of 2022
==========================================================
AJGARHUSEN GULAMHUSEN GHORI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR V B MALIK(5071) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMIR J. DAVE
Date : 09/03/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice
of rule for and on behalf of respondent - State.
2. The petitioner has filed this petition to
invoke inherent jurisdiction vested under Articles
226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and read
with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
to release the muddamal vehicle i.e. BAJAJ AUTO
RICKSHAW bearing RTO Registration No.GJ-31-T-0624
in connection with the FIR being CR.
No.11187008210358 of 2021 registered with Virpur
Police Station, District- Mahisagar for the offence
punishable under Sections 5(1), 6(B) and 8 of the
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
Animal Protection Act and under Sections 268, 295,
429 of the IPC and under section 119 fo the Gujarat
Police Act.
3. Heard learned learned advocates for the
parties
4. Learned advocate for the petitioner has
submitted that the muddamal vehicle has been
detained by the investigating officer and that if
the interim custody of the vehicle is not given,
serious prejudice would be caused to the petitioner
as the muddamal vehicle would get substantially
damaged by the time trial gets concluded and
probably by that time the value of the muddamal
vehicle may also become 'Nil' as the vehicle is
lying under the open sky in different climatic
conditions. It was further submitted that this
Court has ordered release of muddamal vehicles. It
was accordingly urged that this Court may direct
release of the muddamal vehicle in exercise of the
extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
Constitution of India on suitable terms and
conditions.
5. It is also contended that as per various
judgments of this Court and Hon'ble Apex Court in
case of Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of
Gujarat reported in AIR 2003 SC 638 and in case of
Smt. Basava Kom Dyaman Gauda Patil Vs. State of
Mysore reported in (1977) 4 SCC 358, wherein the
captioned mudamal has been released.
6. Per contra, learned APP has heavily opposed
and placed reliance upon the judgment dated
18.12.2017 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court in case of Jhala Ghanshyamsingh Mobatsingh
vs. State of Gujarat in Special Criminal
Application No. 9745 of 2017. Learned APP further
contended that the order passed by the learned
trial Court is just and proper.
7. Having heard the arguments advanced by both
the sides, while determining the other issues
raised by the learned APP with reference to Mines
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
Act and also with reference to judgments of this
Court and judgment dated 18.12.2017 in case of
Jhala Ghanshyamsingh Mobatsingh vs. State of
Gujarat and other provisions of the said Act and
referring to that and the issues to be determined
in future in appropriate proceedings being
contentious issue, this Court is not inclined to
enter into that arena in the present matter and
instead exercised powers vested under Articles 226
and 227 of the Constitution of India.
8. This Court has also assistance of judgments
and orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court, which are as under:
(a) In case of Vipul Roshan Kumar Shah vs.
State of Gujarat order dated 15.06.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
6957 of 2019.
(b) In case of Saramanbhai Devsibhai Barad
vs. State of Gujarat order dated 10.06.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
8601 of 2019.
(c) In case of Mahesh Mansukhbhai Dholaria
vs. State of Gujarat order dated 19.08.2019
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
7806 of 2019.
(d) In case of Anirrudhsinh Pravinsinh Jadeja
vs. State of Gujarat order dated 10.08.2018
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
6039 of 2018.
(e) In case of Dilipbhai Ramanbhai Chaudhari
(Legal Heirs of Late Ramanbhai Chaudhari) vs.
State of Gujarat order dated 14.08.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
3387 of 2020.
(f) In case of Smitaben Kalpeshbhai Chaudhary
vs. State of Gujarat order dated 20.07.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
2851 of 2020.
(g) In case of Jignasha Kalpeshbhai Prajapati
thro POA Kalpeshbhai Bhagwanbhai Prajapati
vs. State of Gujarat order dated20.07.2020
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
2896 of 2020.
(h) In case of Devabhai Ranchhodbhai Ahir vs.
State of Gujarat order dated 20.07.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
2853 of 2020.
(i) In case of Vipul Roshan Kumar Shah vs.
State of Gujarat order dated 15.06.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
6957 of 2019.
(j) In case of Vipul Roshan Kumar Shah vs.
State of Gujarat order dated 22.07.2020
passed in Special Criminal Application No.
7143 of 2019
9. This Court notices that the said muddmal
vehicle was meant for transfer of material from
legal mines and further this offence was not as per
instructions of present petitioner to the driver,
considering the decision of Sunderbhai Ambalal
Desai Vs. State of Gujarat (Supra), wherein Hon'ble
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
Apex Court lamented scenario that vehicle having
unattended and becoming junk within the premises of
Police Station, further the captioned muddamal
vehicle was used by employee of the petitioner and
petitioner is suffering from many months,
therefore, bearing in mind all such facts and
circumstances, the petitioner has to be given back
his muddamal vehicle with few conditions.
10. Resultantly, this petition is allowed, and the
order dated 29.01.2022 passed by the learned
Sessions Judge, Lunawada is set aside. The
authority concerned is directed to release the
vehicle of petitioner, BAJAJ AUTO RICKSHAW bearing
RTO Registration No.GJ-31-T-0624 in the terms and
conditions that the petitioner:
1. shall furnish a solvent surety of the
amount equivalent to the value of the vehicle
in question as per the value disclosed in the
seizure memo or panchnama.
2. Shall file an undertaking before the trial
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
Court that prior to alienation or transfer in
any mode or manner, prior permission of the
concerned Court shall be taken till
conclusion of the trial,
3. Shall also file an undertaking to produce
the vehicle as an when directed by the trial
Court
4. If the I.O. finds use of vehicle in such
anti-social, illegal activity by the present
petitioner then this order shall stand cancel
and the vehicle will be seized.
5. The trial Court shall verify the ownership
of the vehicle before releasing the same.
11. Before handing over the possession of the
vehicle to the petitioner, necessary photographs
shall be taken and a detailed Panchnama in that
regard, if not already drawn, shall also be drawn
for the purpose of trial.
12. If, the I.O. finds it necessary, Videography
R/SCR.A/3850/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2023
of the vehicle also shall be done. Expenses towards
the photographs and the videography shall be BORNE
by the petitioner. Rule is made absolute. Direct
Service is permitted.
(SAMIR J. DAVE,J) MEHUL B. TUVAR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!