Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukeshbhai Amratbhai Chaudhary vs Ibrahimbhai Hasanbhai Mansuri
2023 Latest Caselaw 1934 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1934 Guj
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Mukeshbhai Amratbhai Chaudhary vs Ibrahimbhai Hasanbhai Mansuri on 27 February, 2023
Bench: Samir J. Dave
     R/SCR.A/2647/2023                          ORDER DATED: 27/02/2023




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2647 of 2023

==========================================================
                    MUKESHBHAI AMRATBHAI CHAUDHARY
                                  Versus
                     IBRAHIMBHAI HASANBHAI MANSURI
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMIT P PATEL(3498) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR MANAN MEHTA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMIR J. DAVE

                            Date : 27/02/2023

                             ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned APP and learned advocate Ms. Mrinal Bhatnagar appearing for the original complainant waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents. With the consent of learned advocates on both the sides, the matter is heard finally.

2. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner-convict has prayed to quash and set aside, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties, the judgment and order dated 31.12.2022 passed by the learned 4th Addl. Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Gandhinagar in Criminal Case No.5080 of 2020 whereby, the petitioner came to be convicted for the offence punishable

R/SCR.A/2647/2023 ORDER DATED: 27/02/2023

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, "the NI Act") and has been sentenced to undergo SI for two years and to pay compensation of Rs.10 Lacs along with 6% interest from the date of complaint to the original complainant.

3. Learned advocate Mr. Amit Patel appearing for the petitioner-accused submitted that the parties have mutually settled the dispute and that pursuant to such settlement, the original complainant has also filed an Affidavit, which is on record. The complainant has categorically stated in the Affidavit that the dispute between them has been amicably resolved and that he has no objection, if the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence as also the consequential proceedings, if any, are quashed and set aside as no grievance survives between them.

4. Heard learned advocates on both the sides. Section 147 of the NI Act deals with "Offences to be compoundable". It was inserted by Act No.55 of 2002 with effect from 06.02.2003. For ready reference, Section 147 is reproduced hereunder:-

"147. Offences to be compoundable. - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure,

R/SCR.A/2647/2023 ORDER DATED: 27/02/2023

1973 (2 of 1974), every offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable."

5. Section 147 of the N.I. Act is in the nature of an enabling provision, which provides for the compounding of offences prescribed under the Act and thereby, serving as an exception to the general rule incorporated in Section 320 of Cr.P.C. which states that "No offence shall be compounded except as provided by this Section". However, since Section 147 was inserted by way of an amendment to a special law, the same would override the effect of Section 320(a) of Cr.P.C. especially keeping in mind that Section 147 carries a non- obstante clause.

6. In Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., AIR 2010 SC 1907, the Apex Court held that Section 147 of the N.I. Act is in the nature of an enabling provision and serves as an exception to the general rule incorporated in sub-section (a) of Section 320 of Cr.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the principle rendered in Damodar S. Prabhus's case (supra), the offence in question deserves to be compounded.

R/SCR.A/2647/2023 ORDER DATED: 27/02/2023

7. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 31.12.2022 passed by the learned 4 th Addl. Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Gandhinagar in Criminal Case No.5080 of 2020 and all consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the charge/s levelled against him. Rule is made absolute.

(SAMIR J. DAVE, J)

PRAVIN KARUNAN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter