Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5624 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/713/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 713 of 2023
In
F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 11311 of 2021
==========================================================
HEIRS OF DECD. AMRUTLAL RAMJIBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KRUSHNAKANT D PATEL(10632) for the Applicant(s) No.
1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4
MR TEJAS P SATTA(3149) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS TANUSHREE SHRIMAL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 03/08/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the
Limitation Act, 1963, the applicants seek
condonation of delay of 706 days caused in
filing the captioned First Appeal against the
judgment dated 30.12.2017 and decree dated
10.01.2018 passed in the Land Acquisition
Reference (LAR) Case No.220/2005 in group LAR
No.210/2005 to 221/2005 (main LAR No.210/2005)
by the learned Additional Senior civil Judge,
Dhoraji.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/713/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Krushnakant
Patel for the appellants and learned Assistant
Government Pleader Ms.Tanushree Shrimal for
the respondent No.1.
3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned
Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Tanushree
Shrimal waives service of notice of rule for
the respondent No.1.
4. Learned advocate Mr.Krushnakant Patel
submitted that the claimants would waive the
interest for the period of delay caused in
filing this Appeal on the amount if any
enhanced.
5. Having regard to the submissions advanced
by the learned advocates for the respective
parties and more particularly considering the
averments made in the memorandum of
application, the Court is of the view that the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/713/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
delay caused in filing the First Appeal has
been sufficiently explained.
6. In view of the submission made by learned
advocate Mr.Krushnakant Patel for the
applicants to the effect that the claimants
would waive the interest for the period of
delay caused in filing the appeal, the Court
is of the view that the delay caused in filing
the First Appeal deserves to be condoned.
7. The application, therefore, succeeds and
is, accordingly, allowed on condition that the
applicants shall waive the claim of interest
for the period of delay in preferring the
First Appeal. The delay caused in filing the
First Appeal is hereby condoned. Rule is made
absolute accordingly with no order as to
costs.
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) PALAK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!