Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5621 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/2140/2018 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2140 of 2018
==========================================================
YOGENDRABHAI HARJIVANBHAI RATHOD & 5 other(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MH SHEKHAWAT(7194) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6
Though served, none for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
Date : 03/08/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed by the applicants
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,
for quashing the impugned FIR being C.R. - I No.30 of 2017
registered before the Modhera Police Station, Mehsana for the
offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 504 and 114
of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule
for and on behalf of respondent - State. Though served, the
complainant has chosen not to appear and contest this
application before this Court.
3. When the matter is called out, learned advocate
for the applicants has tendered a copy of the judgment
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/2140/2018 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
passed by the learned trial Court in Criminal Case No.728 of
2019 dated 25.11.2022, whereby the trial qua applicant No.1
is decided by the learned trial Court and the learned trial
Court has acquitted the applicant No.1 - husband from the
charges levelled against him, by observing that the
complainant is not supported the case of the prosecution; and
further the complainant is declared hostile by the prosecution;
and further the learned trial Court has observed, while
referring the deposition of the complainant - Exh.11, that the
complainant has clearly stated in her deposition that the in-
laws have not harassed the complainant.
4. In view of above, since the complainant herself
turned hostile before the learned trial Court in the trial
proceedings against the husband, as observed by the learned
trial Court in its judgment dated 25.11.2022 passed in
Criminal Case No.728 of 2019 vis-a-vis the deposition of the
complainant herself (Exh.11) recorded before the learned trial
Court that the complainant is not harassed by her in-laws,
the prayers made in this application need to be allowed in
view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Gian Singh versus State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303. Therefore, the impugned complaint needs to be quashed and set aside qua the applicants - the in-laws.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/2140/2018 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2023
undefined
5. For the reasons recorded above, the following order is
passed.
5.1 The present application is allowed qua the
applicants.
5.2 The impugned FIR being C.R. - I No.30 of 2017
registered before the Modhera Police Station, District :
Mehsana is hereby quashed and set aside qua the applicants.
5.3 The consequential proceedings arising from the
impugned FIR, if any, are also hereby quashed and set aside
qua the applicants.
5.4 Rule is made absolute accordingly.
Direct service is permitted.
(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) M.H. DAVE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!