Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Spl Land Acq Officer vs Rabari Dashrathbhai Bhatibhai
2023 Latest Caselaw 2978 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2978 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Spl Land Acq Officer vs Rabari Dashrathbhai Bhatibhai on 18 April, 2023
Bench: A.S. Supehia
C/FA/1703/2020                              ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023




      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                  R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1703 of 2020
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 178 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1198 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 179 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1202 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 180 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1257 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 181 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1258 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 182 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1260 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 183 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1261 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 184 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1267 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 185 of 2022
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1263 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 70 of 2023
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1210 of 2019
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 151 of 2023
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 647 of 2022
                               With
                 R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 106 of 2023
                                 In
                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1703 of 2020



                             Page 1 of 13

                                                Downloaded on : Tue Apr 25 20:30:21 IST 2023
      C/FA/1703/2020                              ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023




                                    With
                      R/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 107 of 2023
                                      In
                         FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 of 2020
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1198 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1202 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 647 of 2022
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1210 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 of 2020
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1257 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1258 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1260 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1261 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1263 of 2019
                                    With
                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1267 of 2019
==========================================================
                          SPL LAND ACQ OFFICER
                                  Versus
                      RABARI DASHRATHBHAI BHATIBHAI
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ADITYASINH JADEJA, AGP for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2
for the Defendant(s) No. 5
MR AV PRAJAPATI(672) for the Defendant(s) No.
1,10,11,12,13,14,15,2,3,4,6,7,8,9
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI

                          Date : 18/04/2023
                        COMMON ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)

1. The present matters arise from the judgement and award dated 31.07.2017 passed by the learned

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mehsana in Land Acquisition Reference Case Nos.1620-1713 of 2011. The land reference cases emanate from the land acquired of village Heduva (Rajgar), Taluka Virpur, Dist.Mehsana, by which the land acquisition body, for construction of Mehsana Bypass Highway. For which Section 4 notification under the provision of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") was issued on 15.11.2008, Section 6 notification was published on 17.08.2009 and award under Section 11 of the Act was passed on 27.04.2010 in LAQ No.9 of 2008, whereby the appellant No.1 awarded the compensation for the acquired land at Rs.80/- per sq.mtr. for the road touch land and Rs.66/- for non-road touch land. The claimants demanded Rs.5,000/- per sq.mtr. The Reference Court, after recording oral and documentary evidence, has awarded an additional amount of Rs.1,584/- per sq.mtr. for non-road-touch land and Rs.2,065/- per sq.mtr. for road touch land along with statutory benefits. Being aggrieved, the land acquiring body has filed the captioned first appeals, whereas the claimants have filed cross- objections seeking enhancement of the compensation.

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

2. Learned AGP appearing for the acquiring body has submitted that the Reference Court has fallen in error in not appreciating the report of the District Valuation Committee, Mehsana dated 17.01.2005 i.e. below Exh.43, which had determined the market value of village Nagalpur of Rs.1,100/- per sq.mtr. as on 28.07.2003. It is submitted that the Special Land Acquisition Officer has precisely determined the amount of compensation, after selling the agricultural land and non-agricultural land of the said village however, the same is not appreciated by the Reference Court. Thus, it is submitted that the impugned judgement and award is required to be quashed and set aside.

3. Per contra, learned advocate Mr.Prajapati appearing for the claimants has submitted that in fact, a mistake has been committed by the Reference Court, while appreciating the report of the District Valuation Committee below Exh.43 of aforesaid non-agricultural land and instead of considering value of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr., the Reference Court has considered the amount of Rs.2,200/- per sq.mtr., which was never determined by the committee. He has submitted that the sale deed below Exh.44 and Exh.45

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

pertain to village Nagalpur, in which the market value of the land can be determined as Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. as on 03.10.2007. By placing reliance on the map of Mehsana Taluka at Exh.46, he has submitted that village Heduva is almost 4 kms. away from Nagalpur village and accordingly, the amount of compensation is required to be re- determined and is required to be enhanced. Thus, he has submitted that the first appeals may be dismissed and cross-objections may be allowed.

4. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and also perused the documents as pointed out by them.

5. The facts, which are not in dispute, are that for the land acquired by the acquiring body of village Heduva (Rajgar) for the purpose of constructing Mehsana Bypass Highway, Section 4 notification was issued on 15.11.2008 and Section 6 notification was published on 17.08.2009. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.66/- per sq.mtr. for the non-road touch agricultural land and Rs.80/- per sq.mtr. for the road touch land vide award dated 30.10.2010.

6. Being aggrieved, the claimants demanded Rs.5,000/- per sq.mtr. The claimants have placed reliance on below Exh.92/1 i.e. the judgement of

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

village Panchot in LAR Nos.1620-1713 of 2011, wherein Section 4 notification was issued on 11.02.2009. The Reference Court in that case had awarded an amount of Rs.2,178.57/- per sq.mtr. for non-road touch land and Rs.2,824.95/- per sq.mtr. for the road touch land. It is not in dispute that by the judgement and order dated 05.04.2023, this Court had rejected First Appeal No.4460 of 2018 and allied matters filed by the acquiring body and has confirmed such award. It is also not in dispute that village Panchot is approximately 7 to 8 kms. away from village Nagalpur, of which the District Valuation Committee in its report below Exh.43 has determined the market value of land of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. as on 08.10.2004 and accordingly the Reference Court has determined the amount of compensation for the lands acquired of village Panchot.

7. The claimants relied upon the evidence below Exh.92/1 i.e. judgement of the Reference Court for the land acquired of village Panchot, for which the Reference Court has determined Rs.2,178.57/- per sq.mtr. for non-road touch land and Rs.2,824.95/- per sq.mtr. for the road touch land. The same was the subject matter of challenge before this Court in First Appeal No.4460 of 2018 and allied matters and by the judgement dated 05.04.2023, this court rejected

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

the appeals filed by the same acquiring body by holding thus:

"7. We have perused Exh.164, District Valuation Committee Report, which is of 8.10.2004. It reveals that for the Village-Nagalpur, District Valuation Committee has determined the price of the land at Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. A perusal of Exh.149, which pertains to Sale Deed dated 30.10.2007 of Village- Nagalpur for Rs.2,06,40,000/- for 6880 sq.mtrs. of land, the Reference Court has determined the amount of compensation at Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. by taking the average. A perusal of map at Exh.157, indicates that Village-Nagalpur is adjoining to Village- Panchot. The by-pass highway for which the land is acquired passes through Village-Panchot. The distance between Nagalpur and Village Panchot is approximately 8 to 9 kilometers. However, it is noticed by us that Village-Nagalpur falls within the outskirts of Mehsana city. Thus, looking to the distance between Village-Nagalpur and Village-Panchot and topography of the area, we are of the considered opinion that since by-pass highway for which lands were acquired passes through Village-Panchot, whereas Village- Nagalpur is situated at the outskirts of Mehsana city, deduction of 20% by the Reference Court from the final amount of Rs.3,000/- was appropriate. On the evaluation of the aforesaid evidence, we are of the considered opinion that the Reference Court has not committed any error in determining amount of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. towards land acquired at Village-Panchot. The 20% deduction from Rs.3,000/- would come to Rs.2,400/- per sq.mtr. Thereafter, further deduction of 40% is made from the aforesaid amount of Rs.2,400/- which pertains to 30% for N.A.Purpose and 10% deduction of smallness of plot, which would come to Rs.960/-. Hence, amount of Rs.1440 (Rs.2400 - Rs.960) is arrived at. The District Valuation Committee Report is of 8.10.2004 and, in the present case, Section 4 Notification was issued on 11.2.2009 and as the Reference Court has considered difference of four years, four months and four days, and has considered 10% rise of market value per annum and had determined the amount of Rs.2,178.57 per sq.mtr. (Rs.1440 + 144 = Rs.1584/-) and after lapse of four years period, it would come

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

to Rs.2178.57. The Special Land Acquisition Officer has awarded Rs.91/- per sq.mtr. and hence, the amount of compensation would come to Rs.2087.57 (2178.57 - Rs.91), which if rounded off will be Rs.2088/- per sq.mtr. for the other land, which is not road touch. For the road touch land, the Reference Court has calculated and awarded Rs.2707/- per sq.mtr. i.e. Rs.2844.95 awarded by the reference Court deducting Rs.118/- awarded by Special Land Acquisition Officer, which is rounded off to Rs.2707/- per sq.mtr.

8. It is also noticed by this Court that the Reference Court has determined the amount of Rs.2707/- per sq.mtr. for road touch land on the basis of the award passed by Special Land Acquisition Officer of Rs.118/- per sq.mtr. Thus, in the considered opinion of this Court, after considering the oral as well as documentary evidence, the Reference Court has precisely concluded and awarded the amount, which do not require any interference, as we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and award. We are not convinced to alter the compensation, hence, these First Appeals as well as Cross Objections do not require any interference and the same are dismissed. Record and Proceedings be sent back to the concerned trial Court forthwith."

8. The same evidence has been placed reliance by the Reference Court, while determining the additional compensation for the village Heduva (Rajgar). The Reference Court has placed reliance on the report of the District Valuation Committee, which pertains to village Nagalpur, which is 4 kms. away from village Heduva. The Reference Court, while determining the compensation on the basis of the valuation report has determined Rs.2,200/- per sq.mtr. for awarding compensation.

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

9. In the considered opinion of this Court, the Reference Court has fallen in error by determining the amount on the basis of Rs.2,200/-. A perusal of the District Valuation Committee report below Exh.43 indicates that in fact for the lands acquired of village Nagalpur, the District Valuation Committee has determined Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. as on 08.10.2004. It appears that through mistake, the Reference Court has considered Rs.2,200/- per sq.mtr., on the meeting which was held on 28.07.2003 by the District Valuation Committee and has totally ignored the compensation fixed at Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. by the meeting, which was held subsequently on 08.10.2004. Thus, it is apparent that the Reference Court has committed error in considering the amount of Rs.2,200/- per sq.mtr. for the lands acquired of village Nagalpur instead of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. and accordingly, the Reference Court has proceeded to determine the compensation of village Heduva.

10. The claimants had also placed reliance on the sale deed below Exh.82 for the very same village Heduva dated 19.11.2008, wherein valuation of Rs.2,225/- per sq.mtr. has been considered. The reliance is also placed by the claimants on

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

Exh.44 and Exh.45 i.e. sale deeds of non- agricultural land of village Nagalpur, admeasuring 6,880 sq.mtr., wherein the market value of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. has been considered as on 03.10.2007.

11. It is not in dispute that Panchot village is 7-8 kms. away from village Nagalpur, for which this Court has already dismissed the first appeal challenging the judgement and award of the Reference Court. For the land acquired of village Panchot by the very same acquiring body, the Reference Court has awarded Rs.2,178.57/- per sq.mtr. for non-road touch land and Rs.2,824.95/- per sq.mtr. for road-touch land, of which Section 4 notification was issued on 11.02.2009. The Reference Court, though has considered the evidence of the District Valuation Committee below Exh.43, has erroneously considered the amount of Rs.2,200/- sq.mtr. of village Nagalpur instead of Rs.3,000/- as on 08.10.2004. Thus, as per the judgement of this Court dated 05.04.2023 rendered in First Appeal Nos.4406 of 2018 and allied matters, this Court has deducted 40% from the compensation from the amount of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. and accordingly, by adopting the same formula, by deducting the 40% amount from the

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

amount of Rs.3,000/- per sq.mtr. i.e. the amount determined by the District Valuation Committee for village Nagalpur, for the present village Heduva, the compensation is required to be determined on the basis of amount of Rs.1,800/- per sq.mtr.

12. In the present case, Section 4 notification was issued on 15.11.2008, whereas the market value determined below Exh.43 for village Nagalpur is as on 08.10.2004 and, therefore, there is a gap of four years and one month and accordingly, by giving 10% increase on Rs.1,800/- per sq.mtr., the same would come to Rs.720/- per sq.mtr. and the value of the agricultural road touch land is required to be determined at Rs.2,520/-(Rs.1,800 + Rs.720) per sq.mtr. For the non-agricultural land, as per the settled proposition of law, 30% amount is required to be added on the amount determined, l.e Rs.1,800/-, which will come to Rs.756/- hence, total amount would be come to Rs.2,520 + Rs.756 = Rs.3,276/- is determined for such land.

13. The reference Court has awarded Rs.1650/- for agricultural land and, therefore, the applicants- claimants are entitled to enhancement of Rs.870/- per sq.mtr.(Rs.2,520 - Rs.1,650) and Rs.1,131/-

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

per sq.mtr. (Rs.3,276 - Rs.2,145) for the non- agricultural lands.

14. The amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer is also required to be reduced. The Officer has determined Rs.66/- per sq.mtr. for the agricultural land and Rs.80/- per sq.mtr. for the non-agricultural land. The same is required to be deducted, and if the same is deducted from Rs.870 - Rs.66 = Rs.804/- per sq.mtr is determined for agricultural land. For non-agricultural land an amount of Rs.80/- per sq.mtr., which is awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for agricultural land is required to be deducted from the amount of Rs.1,131/- per sq.mtr., which would come to Rs.1,051/- per sq.mtr.(Rs.1131 - Rs.80).

15. Accordingly, the differential amount of compensation shall be deposited before the Reference Court within a period of three months. The claimants will be entitled to statutory interests as awarded by the refrence court on the differential amounts. The same shall be disbursed to the claimants, after due verification.

C/FA/1703/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/04/2023

16. The first appeals are dismissed, whereas cross-objections are allowed to the aforesaid extent.

17. Registry to place a copy of this order in each of the connected matters.

Sd/-

                                                        (A. S. SUPEHIA, J)

                                                                Sd/-       .
                                                             (D. A. JOSHI,J)
NVMEWADA







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter