Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2939 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2023
R/CR.MA/17828/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17828 of 2019
==========================================================
GITABEN W/O KESHAVLAL PRAJAPATI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AV PRAJAPATI(672) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
NOTICE SERVED THRU CONCERNED POLICE STN for the Respondent(s)
No. 2,3
MR PRANAV TRIVEDI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 13/04/2023
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application, under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants seek to invoke
inherent powers of this Court praying for quashment of the
FIR registered with Fatehganj Police Station, Vadodara
being I-C.R.No.19 of 2006 for the offences punishable
under Sections 498(A) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code
read with Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. The applicants are mother in law and father in law of
respondent no.2. The marriage of respondent no.2 was
solemnized with son of the applicants on 04.05.2023.
Admittedly, the applicants, after the marriage, had gone to
U.S.A. and since long, they are settled there. The
R/CR.MA/17828/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2023
respondent no.2 lodged an FIR, inter alia alleging that she
was subjected to cruelty and harassment by husband and
his relatives. Since 2006, respondent no.2 is living
separately at her parental home. The husband filed HMP
No.587 of 2010 for divorce before the Family Court,
Vadodara. On account of settlement, the parties had
preferred application for divorce by mutual consent under
Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court,
Vadodara vide judgment and order dated 22.09.2015
dissolved the marriage. Pursuant to the questioned FIR,
chargesheet came to be filed against the husband and
maternal aunt of respondent no.2. The Trial Court, vide
judgment and order dated 19.09.2015, acquitted the
husband and maternal aunt from the charges as referred
above.
3. The applicants being in-laws preferred the present
application mainly on the ground that after lodgment of the
FIR, matter has been settled amicably and respondent no.2
is agreed to withdraw the pending litigation.
4. Mr.Prajapati, learned advocate for the applicants
submitted that pursuant to the FIR, chargesheet came to
be filed against the husband and maternal aunt and on
R/CR.MA/17828/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2023
account of amicable settlement, the Trial Court acquitted
them from the charges. The husband had paid Rs.10 lakhs
towards permanent alimony. The Family Court, Vadodara
on the basis of mutual consent passed the decree of
dissolution of marriage. The applicants have permanently
settled at U.S.A. In these circumstances, he would submit
that the continuation of proceedings would amount to
misuse of process of law and Court and therefore, this is a
fit case to exercise the inherent powers to quash the FIR.
5. The respondent no.2 has been served the notice, however,
she has chosen to remain absence from the proceedings.
6. On the other hand, learned APP Mr.Pranav Trivedi for the
respondent - State submitted that respondent no.2-wife
has not supported the contentions raised by the applicants
herein and therefore, the application is liable to be
dismissed.
7. Having considered the contentions raised by learned
advocate for the applicants and on perusal of the material
placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that after
lodging of the FIR, the matter was compromised and
considering the facts of the compromise, the Family Court,
Vadodara passed a decree of divorce. Pursuant to the
R/CR.MA/17828/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2023
chargesheet filed against the husband and maternal aunt
of respondent no.2, the respondent no.2 was examined by
the Trial Court, wherein she had been turned hostile. The
criminal Court has acquitted the husband and maternal
aunt.
8. In view of the aforesaid admitted facts, without entering
into the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that
to prevent the misuse of process of law and Court and for
the ends of justice, this is a fit case to exercise inherent
powers to quash the FIR and other consequential
proceedings therefrom.
9. Resultantly, this application is allowed. The impugned FIR
being I-C.R.No.19 of 2006 registered with Fatehganj
Police Station, Vadodara as well as other consequential
proceedings are hereby quashed and set aside qua the
applicants herein. Direct service is permitted.
(ILESH J. VORA,J) Rakesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!