Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Varshaben Wd/O Rameshchandra ... vs Rasikbhai Kantilal Patel
2021 Latest Caselaw 15804 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15804 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Varshaben Wd/O Rameshchandra ... vs Rasikbhai Kantilal Patel on 7 October, 2021
Bench: J.B.Pardiwala
       C/FA/2364/2019                              ORDER DATED: 07/10/2021




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2364 of 2019

                              With
           CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019
                In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2364 of 2019
                              With
 CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF MATTER) NO. 2 of 2021
                In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2364 of 2019
==========================================================
               VARSHABEN WD/O RAMESHCHANDRA AMRATLAL
                                Versus
                       RASIKBHAI KANTILAL PATEL
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BHAVESH B CHOKSHI(3109) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
for the Defendant(s) No. 10,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
SHIVANI RAJPUROHIT(5377) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
       and
       HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI

                               Date : 07/10/2021

                     COMMON ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

1. This appeal is at the instance of one of the original defendants of the Special Civil Suit No.377 of 2014 instituted by Late Rasikbhai Kantilal Patel [Since deceased Now through his legal heirs] original plaintiff and is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural at Mirzapur dated 08.04.2019 in the above referred suit, by which, the suit came to be allowed determining the 1/7 th share of the original plaintiff in the suit property. The operative part of the order impugned in the present appeal reads thus:-

 C/FA/2364/2019                                 ORDER DATED: 07/10/2021




                           :: O R D E R ::

1. Forged sale deed executed by defendant Nos. 1 to 6 Serial No. 5212/2005 dated 26/04/2004 is made with forged signature of plaintif which is not binding to the plaintif is hereby cancelled as void ab-initio.

2. On the basis of previous false reconveyance sale deed subsequent sale deed executed by defendant Nos. 1 to 6 in favour of defendant Nos. 7 to 10 vide Serial No. 6744/2011 dated 16/06/2011 at the sale price of Rs.3,35,00,000/- is partly cancelled for 1/7th part having right of plaintif and 6/7th part of sale deed for defendant Nos. 7 to 10 shall be valid.

3. Plaintif is declared 1/7th co-sharer in the undivided suit land of Town Planning Scheme No.121 having Final Plot No.11 admeasuring 7406 sq.mtrs. of land and is entitled to partition and vacant and peaceful possession of 1058 sq.mtrs. of land in the said final plot.

4. Defendant Nos. 7 to 10 and their descendants, successors, assignees and transferees in the suit land are hereby restrained to make any kind of transfer of possession of the suit property or make any kind of contracts, writings or execute any kind of document till the plaintif is provided with possession of the share of the suit land.

5. In case if the property is not divisible at present, plaintif shall be entitled to compensation of 1/7th share for consideration of the sale deed amount of Rs.3,35,00,000/- which amounts to Rs.47,85,714/- with interest thereon from the date of institution of this suit at the rate of 7% per annum till realization of the amount.

6. Defendant Nos.7 to 10 shall also be entitled to recover the decreetal amount of this suit from heirs of defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as well as from defendant Nos. 3 to 6 of the amount paid to the plaintif.

7. Plaintif shall be entitled to decreetal amount from the bank guarantee issued by Nutan Nagrik Co-operative Bank Limited, Jodhpur-Satellite branch produced by defendant Nos.7 to 10 at Exh.151 which is further extended upto dated 04/05/2019 issued in favour of defendant No.10 - Dalpatbhai Mansukhbhai Shah for

C/FA/2364/2019 ORDER DATED: 07/10/2021

the amount of Rs.1,25,00,000/- on the date of this judgment dated 08/04/2019 within period extended by Nutan Nagrik Co- operative Bank Limited as on today of pronouncement of this judgment.

8. Nutan Nagrik Co-operative Bank Limited is directed to deposit decreetal amount on behalf of defendant No. 10 - Dalpatbhai Mansukhbhai Shah towards bank guarantee into this Court immediately.

2. The appeal is of the order 2019. Till this date, no orders have been passed, even of formal notice. Only record and proceedings from the trial Court was ordered to be called for, that too, way- back in September, 2019. During the interregnum period, the parties have been able to arrive at an amicable settlement. The settlement arrived at between the parties has been reduced into writing duly signed by the parties and duly notarized. The deed of settlement accompanied with the Adhar Card, Pan Card etc., have been placed on record alongwith the Civil Application. The deed of settlement with the other documents shall be replaced from the Civil Application and shall from part of the original record of the First Appeal. The same shall be kept for all times to come with the record.

3. It appears that the original plaintiff passed away during the pendency of this appeal. In such circumstances, a draft amendment has been moved. The same is allowed. The necessary incorporation shall be carried out at the earliest. The cause-title be amended accordingly.

4. In view of the aforesaid development, the respondent no.1/1 Mr. Nilesh Rasikbhai Patel is personally present in the Court. He is

C/FA/2364/2019 ORDER DATED: 07/10/2021

being identified by Ms. Shivani Rajpurohit, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1/1. The respondent no.1/2 Ms. Nikita Rasikbhai Patel has not been able to remain present as she is at Banglore.

5. In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Choksi, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has instructions from his client, who is also present in the Court today not to press this appeal any further and withdraw the same. In such circumstances referred to above, this appeal is disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

The connected Civil Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)

(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) A. B. VAGHELA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter