Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Choubey Prithuraj Balkrishan vs Gujarat Technological ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 5895 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5895 Guj
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Choubey Prithuraj Balkrishan vs Gujarat Technological ... on 14 June, 2021
Bench: Nirzar S. Desai
     C/LPA/196/2021                             ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 196 of 2021
                              In
          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 974 of 2021
                             With
          CIVIL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2021
                               In
            R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 196 of 2021
                             With
 CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR VACATING INTERIM RELIEF) NO. 2 of 2021
                               In
            R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 196 of 2021
==========================================================
              CHOUBEY PRITHURAJ BALKRISHAN
                          Versus
   GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY NOTICE TO BE SERVED
             THROUGH THE REGISTRAR & 3 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANVESH V VYAS(5654) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 3,4
MR DG SHUKLA(1998) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR FB BRAHMBHATT(1016) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                          Date : 14/06/2021

                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)

1.Heard Mr. Anvesh Vyas, learned advocate for the appellant, Mr. D.G. Shukla, learned advocate for the respondent No.1 University and Mr. F.B. Brahmbhatt, learned advocate for the respondent No.2 College through video conferencing.

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

2.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and order dated 27.01.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav), whereby, the learned Single Judge was pleased to dismiss the petition filed by the petitioner, the present appellant has filed the present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause-15 of the Letters Patent Act.

3.The appellant herein has filed the writ petition and has inter-alia, prayed for the following reliefs:

"(A). Be pleased to allow the present petition.

(B). Be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion and declared the result of Semester Six.

(C). Be pleased to direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the scheduled examinations of Semester 7 of Computer Engineering which is held on 19/01/2021.

(D). Pending admission and hearing of this petition be pleased to allow the petitioner in the Examination held by the respondent for Semester No. 7 of Computer Engineering.

(E). Be pleased to pass any such or further order/s as it may deem fit by this Hon'ble Court."

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

4.It is the case of the appellant in the writ petition that the respondent University as well as the College should declare the result of the appellant of the 6th semester and should be promoted to 7th semester, by virtue of the guideline issued by the university dated 29.04.2020 and the State Government dated 24.05.2020 providing the benefit of carry forward.

5.The record indicates that the appellant is pursuing the computer engineering course which have 8 semesters. The learned Single Judge of this Court (Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav) passed the following interim order on 18.01.2021:

"Heard Mr. Anvesh V. Vyas, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing.

Issue Notice, returnable on 20.01.2021.

In the meantime, the petitioner shall be permitted to appear in the examination scheduled for tomorrow and 20.01.2021 subject to further orders. It is clarified that mere appearing in the examination will not create any equities in favour of the petitioner.

The copy of this order be also forwarded to the learned counsel of the petitioner through email and / or fax for onwards communication to the University."

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

6.After the said order was passed, the University made a statement before this Court that the appellant has been given benefit of the Merit Based Progression and he has treated to have cleared all backlogs in summer, 2020 and according to the University, the appellant was treated as having completed 6th semester in October, 2020. In response to the notice issued by this court, the affidavits were filed by the respondent College as well as the university. All premises of the appellant was a certificate issued by the College, which even according to the affidavit filed in this appeal was issued by way of a mistake. The learned Single Judge after considering the provision of the backlogs for detention, has observed thus in para-5.2 and 5.3:

"5.2 The 6th semester commenced from 12.12.2019. Thus, after the petitioner appeared for Semester 5 examinations in Winter 2019, he had total 9 backlogs i.e. 5 for semesters 2 to 4 and 4 for semester 5. Thus, considering the guidelines as stated above, since the petitioner had backlogs exceeding 4 in number, he could not be allowed to continue his 6 th semester study which commenced from 12.12.2019 and ended on 14.04.2020.

5.3 However, during the lockdown, the resolutions of the UGC dated 29.04.2020 and the

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

State dated 24.05.2020 stipulated Merit Based Progression looking to the Covid pandemic. Thus, the petitioner was able to clear total 9 backlogs in Summer - 2020. Thus, the backlogs of semesters 2 to 4 having been cleared post the resolutions in September 2020, petitioner will be entitled to enter the 6th semester which commenced from 28.12.2020. Thus, the contentions of Mr. Vyas, learned advocate for the petitioner is fallacious and cannot be sustained."

Thereafter, the petition came to be dismissed.

7.Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties, we do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

8.At this stage, it deserves to be noted that Mr. Anvesh Vyas, learned advocate appearing for the appellant makes a statement before this Court that the appellant has pursued his classes of 7th semester and also pursued 8th semester. The said fact has been denied on oath by the University as well as by the College, which has not have been controverted by the appellant in this appeal.

9.Be that as it may, the fact remains that

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

because of the policy decision taken by the University Grant Commission as well as the State Government, even according to the respondent university, all backlogs 9 in number stood clear and therefore, all 9 backlogs upto 5th semester stood clear on the basis of the Merit Based Progression, which happened in the month of October, 2020. The record indicates that thereafter the appellant went into 6th semester, which has already over in the month of April-May, 2021. Meanwhile, the authorities and the university in particular, has adopted the policy of Mass Promotion in view of that fact the appellant in the peculiar facts and circumstances, would be entitled to a similar benefit as far as 6th semester is concerned.

10. Mr. D.G. Shukla, learned advocate appearing for the respondent university also submitted that such benefit can be considered in favour of the appellant, in view of the fact that the appellant has already kept the term of 6th semester, the respondent university as well as college shall consider the same.

11. As far as claim of the appellant that he has studied in 7th semester as well as 8th semester, is contrary to his own version in

C/LPA/196/2021 ORDER DATED: 14/06/2021

paragraph nos. 10 and 12 of the writ petition, learned advocate Mr. Vyas appearing for the appellant also therefore does not press such contention.

12. In view of the aforesaid, the appellant be permitted by the respondent University and the College to take admission in 7th semester from June, 2021. The appellant shall keep terms for 7th semester and thereafter appear in 7th semester examination, as and when the same is ensuing.

13. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal stands disposed of. The order dated 27.01.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 974 of 2021 is modified only to the aforesaid extent.

14. As the main Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of, both the Civil Applications would not survive and accordingly disposed of.

(R.M.CHHAYA, J)

(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Pradhyuman

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter