Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

J.K. Lakshami Cement Ltd. vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 992 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 992 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Gujarat High Court
J.K. Lakshami Cement Ltd. vs State Of Gujarat on 21 January, 2021
Bench: Sonia Gokani, Sangeeta K. Vishen
           C/SCA/16288/2019                                      IA ORDER



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
  MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR EXTENSION OF TIME) NO. 1 of 2020
          In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16288 of 2019
==========================================================

STATE OF GUJARAT Versus J.K. LAKSHAMI CEMENT LTD.

========================================================== Appearance:

MR JAYNEEL PARIKH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the PETITIONER(s) No.

MR UCHIT N SHTEH, for the RESPONDENT(s) No. ==========================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN

Date : 21/01/2021

IA ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)

1. The applicant has approached this Court, seeking following reliefs:

"7. ...

A. YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to allow and admit this application.

B. The applicants humbly prays that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant further extension of four months to comply with the order dated 18.12.2019 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Special Civil Application No. 16288 of 2019.

C. ..."

2. We have heard the learned AGP, Mr. Parikh, for the applicants and the learned Advocate, Mr. Sheth, for the respondent, who invited the attention of this Court to the order dated 06.01.2021, passed by the Coordinate Bench in Misc. Civil Application No. 697 of 2020 in Special

C/SCA/16288/2019 IA ORDER

Civil Application No. 16288 of 2019, which reads thus:

"Special Civil Application Nos. 15333 and 16288 of 2019 were allowed vide judgment and order dated 18.12.2019. The operative portion of the judgment as contained in paragraph 21 thereof reads as follow :

"21. For the foregoing reasons, the petitions succeed and are accordingly allowed. The respondents are directed to forthwith process the refund claims of the respective petitioners and grant refund of the tax amount collected from the petitioners and deposited by the seller in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks of the receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is, however, clarified that once the refund claim of the petitioners is processed, Reliance Industries Limited would not be entitled to claim any such refund. Rule is made absolute accordingly, with no order as to costs."

2. This contempt application has been filed alleging noncompliance of the said direction. Notices were issued on 25.11.2020 fixing today's date. Today, Mr. Dharmesh Devnani, learned Assistant Government Pleader, upon instructions, has stated that the State of Gujarat has preferred SLP before the Supreme Court which has since been filed, diary number has been allotted. He thus prays that the hearing of this contempt may be deferred to enable the State to take its chance before the Supreme Court.

3. On the other hand, Mr. Sheth, learned advocate for the opposite party submits that the conduct of the State in preferring an appeal after a period of almost one year and in the meantime, not ensuring compliance of the direction of the Division Bench judgment itself amounts to clear disobedience and

C/SCA/16288/2019 IA ORDER

therefore, the Court may proceed further in the matter.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let this matter be listed after four weeks on 12.02.2021. By the said date, the opposite party may either obtain some protection of the Supreme Court or if they fail, ensure compliance and file an appropriate affidavit before this Court. In the event, the SLP is not taken up for orders in the meantime, by the next date, the State may make deposits as directed by the Division Bench before this Court by way of demand draft or an account payee cheque drawn in favour of Registrar General giving the details of the deposits of the respective petitioners."

3. In wake of the specific directions issued by the Contempt Bench and the time granted of four weeks, i.e. upto 12th February, 2021, this application for extension is not to be entertained.

4. Resultantly, this application fails and stands DISPOSED OF, accordingly.

(SONIA GOKANI, J)

(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) UMESH/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter