Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manju Bibi vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 3905 Gua

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3905 Gua
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Manju Bibi vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors on 4 May, 2026

Author: Devashis Baruah
Bench: Devashis Baruah
                                                                  Page No.# 1/6

GAHC010250572025




                                                          2026:GAU-AS:6072

                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : WP(C)/6544/2025

         MANJU BIBI
         WIFE OF ANOWAR HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF- VILLAGE SANIADI, HAJO, P.O
         -SANIADI, P.S- HAJO, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM.



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
         OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

         2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-6

         3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
         ASSAM
          B.K. KAKATY ROAD
          ULUBARI
          GUWAHATI-7

         4:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN.)
         ASSAM
          B.K. KAKATY ROAD
          ULUBARI
          GUWAHATI-7

         5:THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE -CUM- DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
          KAMRUP
         AMINGAON (LAW AND ORDER)
          DIST- KAMRUP
         ASSAM
                                                                         Page No.# 2/6


          6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
           KAMRUP
          AMINGAON
          ASSAM

          7:THE MOTOR TRANSPORT OFFICER
           KAMRUP
          ASSA

                                BEFORE
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                For the Petitioner(s)   : Mr. A. Hossain, Advocate

                For the Respondent(s)   : Mr. G. Bokolial, Government Advocate


                ·     Date on which Judgment was reserved       : N/A

                ·     Date of Pronouncement of Judgment        : 04.05.2026

                ·     Whether the pronouncement is of
                      the Operative Part of the Judgment       : No

                ·     Whether the full Judgment has been
                      Pronounced                               : Yes

                       JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. A. Hossain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. G. Bokolial, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents.

2. The instant petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities in not making payment of the bills of the Petitioner.

Page No.# 3/6

3. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is the owner of three vehicles bearing Registration Nos. AS-25-S-0002 (Innova), AS-01-EC-0599 (Crane) and AS-01-T-9693 (Water Tanker). The said vehicles were hired by the Respondents on different dates during the years 2023-2025, subject to certain terms and conditions, for maintaining law and order in Kamrup District and were released on different dates after being utilized for varying periods. Thereafter, the Petitioner submitted bills amounting to Rs.27,66,509/- before the Respondent Authorities.

4. It is the further case of the Petitioner that the aforesaid amount has been duly verified by the Respondent Authorities; however, despite such verification, the admitted bill amount of Rs. Rs.27,66,509/- has not been released to the Petitioner. The Petitioner has also submitted various representations to the Respondent Authorities for release of the said amount; however, the amount of Rs.27,66,509/- remains unpaid, for which the Petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

5. Mr. G. Bokolial, the learned Government Advocate during the course of the hearing has placed before this Court an instruction issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kamrup, Amingaon Page No.# 4/6

dated 03.02.2026. The said instruction is kept on record and marked with the letter "X".

6. From a perusal of the said instruction, it appears that the Respondents have duly admitted that the Petitioner is entitled to an amount of Rs.28,32,209/- and not Rs.27,66,509/-. Paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 of the said instruction dated 03.02.2026 being relevant are reproduced herein under:

"4. In respect of paragraph No.4, deponent begs to state that, it is fact that the vehicles were hired for different periods for emergency situation i.e. maintaining law & order situation etc. in Kamrup District as indicated below:

Sl. Registration Types of From To Total Amount Vehicle No. Nos. of Vehicle Nos. of Payable Days

1 AS-25-S-0002 INNOVA 01-12-23 31.12-23 31 days 67,671/-

2 AS-25-S-0002 INNOVA 01-01-24 31-03-24 91 days 2,20,488/-

3 AS-25-S-0002 INNOVA 01-01-24 31-07-24 122 days 2,95,600/-

4 AS-25-S-0002 INNOVA 01-08-24 31-03-25 243 days 5,30,457/-

5 AS-01-EC-0599 CRANE 01-12-23 31-12-23 31 days 93,372/-

6 AS-01-EC-0599 Crane 01-01-24 31-03-24 91 days 2,74,092/-

7 AS-01-EC-0599 CRANE 01-04-24 30-06-24 91 days 2,90,472/-

Page No.# 5/6

8 AS-01-T-9693 WATER 01-12-23 31-12-23 31 days 63,296/-

TANKER

9 AS-01-T-9693 WATER 01-01-24 31-03-24 91 days 1,85,804/-

TANKER

10 AS-01-T-9693 WATER 01-04-24 31-07-24 122 days 2,71,060/-

TANKER

11 AS-01-T-9693 WATER 01-08-24 31-03-25 243 days 5,39,897/-

                     TANKER

                                                      Total Rs. =     28,32,209/-



The Petitioner mentioned in the writ petition that total bill amount Rs.27,66,509/- but as per office records it is found that total amount payable to petitioner Rupees 28,32,209/- (Total twenty eight lakhs thirty two thousand two hundred nine rupees) only not Rs.27,66,509/-.

5. In respect of paragraph No.5 deponent begs to state that proposal of total bill amount Rs.28,32,209/- (Total twenty eight lakhs thirty two thousand two hundred nine rupees) only have already submitted to APHQRs vide this office Memo No.KMP/MT/Hire-Veh/2026/727 dated 28-01-2026 for sanctioning fund but no fund has been received from APHQ to pay the petitioner. Once the funds are made available, the same shall be paid to the petitioner without any delay."

7. Taking into account the above, it therefore appears that the Petitioner is entitled to Rs.28,32,209/-.

8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the following observations and directions:

Page No.# 6/6

(i) The Respondent Authorities are directed pay the Petitioner the admitted amount of Rs.28,32,209/- or such amount after statutory deductions.

(ii) The said exercise be completed within a period of 6 (six) months from the date a certified copy of the instant judgment is served upon the Respondent No.3 i.e. the Director General of Police, Guwahati.

(iii) Any amount paid during the pendency of the present proceedings would be set off at the time of disbursal of the amounts to the Petitioner.

Bijoy Saha         Bijoy Saha


Comparing Assistant
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter