Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 633 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010239622024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./171/2025
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT DARE HOUSE,
2ND FLOOR, NO. 2 N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI-600001 AND ITS BRANCH
OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZA, 4TH FLOOR, OPPOSITE TO S.B. DEORAH
COLLEGE, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI.
VERSUS
RAJA HAZARIKA AND 2 ORS
S/O. SRI. KRISHNA HAZARIKA, R/O. VILL.- MOTHADANG, P/O. AND P/S.
SIVASAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN-785640, PRESENTLY
RESIDING AT- SOUTH SARANIA, P/S. PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI-7, DIST.
KAMRUP (M), REP. BY HIS FATHER KRISHNA HAZARIKA
2:AMIR JAHAN ALI
S/O. BABAJAN ALI
R/O. JENGORIKOTIA
P/O. AND P/S. SIVASAGAR
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN-785640
3:ABDUL WAHID
S/O. MD. ABDUL AHMED
R/O. RANGHAR CHARIALI
P/O. DHULIAPAR
P/S. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN-785664
Page No.# 2/3
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. R. Goswami, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A.T. Sarkar, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 16.05.2025
This is an appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 08.08.2024 passed by the learned Member, MACT No. 2, Kamrup (M), Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as, "the learned Tribunal") in MAC Case No. 1365/2022 whereby an amount of Rs.34,51,372.20/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum has been directed to be paid by the Appellant Insurance Company.
2. Mr. R. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that there are two grounds of objection taken in the instant appeal. First, the identity of the vehicle in question is an issue taking into account that there were 2 (two) G D Entries, one entry was in respect to an unidentified truck whereas the second entry pertains to a motorcycle in question bearing Registration No. AS 04-AA-7711. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant further submitted that neither the driver nor the owner of the motorcycle had appeared before the learned Tribunal and had adduced evidence.
3. The second ground is on the question of quantum submitted that the amount which has been awarded is shockingly disproportionate.
Page No.# 3/3
4. Taking into account the two grounds of objection, the instant appeal is admitted.
5. Call for records.
6. Mr. A.T. Sarkar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and as such there is no requirement of taking any steps against the respondent No. 1. However, Extra copies of the memo of appeal be served upon him within 2 (two) days.
7. As regards the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the appellant is directed to take steps by way of Registered Post with A/D as well as through usual process within 3 (three) days.
8. List the matter after completion of service and upon receipt of the records.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!