Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 526 Gua
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010117952024
2025:GAU-AS:5970
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1943/2024
THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 19, RELAINCE CENTRE, WALCHAND
HIRACHAND MARG, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI 400001 AND
CORPORATE OFFICE AT 570, RECTIFIER HOUSE, NAGAUM CROSS, NEXT
TO ROYAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, WADALA (W), MUMBAI 400031 AND ONE
OF THE BRANCH OFFICES AT PRAG PLAZA, 5TH FLOOR G.S. ROAD,
BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005.
VERSUS
GITA RANI RAMCHIARY AND 3 ORS.
W/O LATE RAMAI RAMCHIARY,
VILL.- BADULIPARA MUKUTAPUR, P.S.- BARBARI, DIST.- BAKSA BTAD,
ASSAM, PIN- 781343.
2:MAYARANI RAMCHIARY
D/O LATE RAMAI RAMCHIARY
VILL.- BADULIPARA MUKUTAPUR
P.S.- BARBARI
DIST.- BAKSA BTAD
ASSAM
PIN- 781343.
(BEING MINOR
WILL BE REP. BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
RES. NO. 1).
3:ANJALI RAMCHIARY
D/O LATE RAMAI RAMCHIARY
VILL.- BADULIPARA MUKUTAPUR
P.S.- BARBARI
Page No.# 2/3
DIST.- BAKSA BTAD
ASSAM
PIN- 781343.
(BEING MINOR
WILL BE REP. BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
RES. NO. 1).
4:THIPSI RAMCHIARY
M/O LATE RAMAI RAMCHIARY
VILL.- BADULIPARA MUKUTAPUR
P.S.- BARBARI
DIST.- BAKSA BTAD
ASSAM
PIN- 781343.
5:M/S ANUPAM NIRMAN PVT. LTD.
R/O BHASKAR NAGAR
BYE LANE NO. 2
ZOO NARENGI ROAD
BESIDE BS PUBLICATION
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781024.
6:BASKAR DAS
S/O DURGESWAR DAS
R/O AKAYA
BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781329
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A J SAIKIA, MR. S. PEGU,M CHETIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR D MONDAL(R-1 TO 3), MR B SARMA(R- 1 TO 3)
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
Date : 14-05-2025
Heard learned counsel Mr. S. Pegu for the applicant, who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with prayer for condonation of delay of 26 (Twenty Six) days.
2. Learned counsel Mr. D. Mondal is present for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
3. Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are not represented today.
4. It is submitted that the applicant has a good case. The delay was not intentional and there was no negligence on the part of the applicant. Due to formalities of the Insurance Company relating to the communication of the judgment and order impugned by the applicant to the Insurer and reply from the Insurer, there arose a delay of 26 (Twenty Six) days.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.
6. Thereby, delay is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and to reflect the name of learned counsel Mr. D. Mondal for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, in the cause list.
7. In terms of the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!