Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4246 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010050292025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1526/2025
TROILUKYA GOHAIN BARUAH
SON OF LATE MIHKANTA GOHAIN BARUAH, P/R/O- NAKARI NAGAR,
WARD NO.3, P.O. AND P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST- LAKHIMPUR,
ASSAM. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT LAMB ROAD, HOUSE NO. 42, 3RD
FLOOR, LATASIL, UZAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT-
KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT COLLECTOR
LAKHIMPUR
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
LAKLHIMPUR
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MR. R S MISHRA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Page No.# 2/3
ORDER
Date : --19.03.2025
Heard Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3.
When the petitioner preferred a revenue appeal, 87RA[L]/2016 before the Assam Board of Revenue, the appeal was disposed of vide Judgment dated 10.10.2017 setting aside an Order dated 13.06.2016 passed in Partition Case no. 68 of 2016 with a further direction to the respondent no. 3 to hear the case afresh and decide the same on merits with the speaking order. As the respondent no. 3 has not disposed of the same in terms of the Judgment dated 10.10.2017, the petitioner is before this Court by the instant writ petition.
Issue notice, returnable on 25.04.2025.
As Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department has appeared and accepted notice for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam has appeared and accepted notices for the respondent nos. 2 & 3, formal notices need not be issued to the said respondents. Mr. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner shall furnish requisite nos. of extra copies of the writ petition along with the annexures, to Mr. Bhattacharjee and Mr. Handique within 2 [two] working days from today.
Mr. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam shall obtain instruction from the respondent no. 3 as regards the reason for non-disposal of the Partition Case no. 68 of 2016 in terms of the Judgment dated 10.10.2017 of the Assam Board of Revenue on the next date of listing.
JUDGE Page No.# 3/3
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!