Pranab Kr. Sarmah vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 2525 Gua

Gauhati High Court

Pranab Kr. Sarmah vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 30 January, 2025

                                                                       Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010114292013




                                                                undefined

                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/2728/2013

         PRANAB KR. SARMAH
         S/O SRI BEDAKANTA SARMAH, R/O BORDOLOI NAGAR, TINSUKIA,
         SECTOR -3, BYE LANE-4, P.O. and P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM,



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY
         OF LABOUR, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, FAFI MARG

         2:THE OIL INDIA LTD.
          REPRESENTED BY THE RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE
          DULIAJAN
          DIST- DIBRUGARH
         ASSAM
          PIN-786602

         3:RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OIL INDIA LTD
          DULIAJAN
          DIST- DIBRUGARH
         ASSAM
          PIN-786602

         4:CHIEF INDUSTRIAL RELATION MANAGER
          OIL INDIA LTD.
          DULIAJAN
          DIST- DIBRUGARH
         ASSAM
          PIN-786602

         5:GENERAL MANAGER
          OIL INDIA LTD.
                                                                           Page No.# 2/2

             DULIAJAN
             DIST- DIBRUGARH
             ASSAM
             PIN-78660

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR.P P DUTTA, MR.A BARUA,MR.A BHATTACHARYA,MR.T J
MAHANTA,MR.B BORA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, O I L, ,MR.A SARMA,MR.S N SARMA,ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                  BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

                                        ORDER

Date : 30.01.2025

Heard T. J. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Kalita, learned Standing Counsel, Oil India Ltd.

The matter was listed today for receiving a clarification in the matter which had come to notice of the Court, after the case was reserved for judgment.

Parties have been heard at length in the matter. Accordingly, the judgment stands reserved.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant