Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2886 Gua
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010017972025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/177/2025
M/S SEVEN CITY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR MS. KILTY SARKAR
OFFICE AT 325
(A) WING SHANTI SHOPPING CENTRE
OPP. RAILWAY STATION
MIRA ROAD EAST
THANE MAHARASHTRA.
2: MS KITTY SARKAR
DAUGHTER OF SRI. DINESH NARAYAN MATHUR
RESIDENT OF A 302
PANCH NATRAJ
YARI ROAD
VERSOVA
ANDHERI (WEST)
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA.
VERSUS
SRI MAYANK SOMANI
RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 305
BHUBANESHWAR TOWER
CHOLADHARA
TRP ROAD
JORHAT
ASSAM- 795001
In Case No. : RERA APPEAL/1/2025
M/S SEVEN CITY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,
Page No.# 2/3
REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR MS. KILTY SARKAR, OFFICE AT
325, (A) WING SHANTI SHOPPING CENTRE, OPP. RAILWAY STATION, MIRA
ROAD EAST, THANE MAHARASHTRA.
2: MS KITTY SARKAR
DAUGHTER OF SRI. DINESH NARAYAN MATHUR
RESIDENT OF A 302
PANCH NATRAJ
YARI ROAD
VERSOVA
ANDHERI (WEST)
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
VERSUS
SRI MAYANK SOMANI,
RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 305, BHUBANESHWAR TOWER, CHOLADHARA,
TRP ROAD, JORHAT, ASSAM- 795001
Advocate for the applicant(s): Ms. G Goswami
Advocate for the respondent(s): X X
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
05.02.2025
Heard Ms. G Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/applicant.
2. This is an application under Order XLI Rule 5 read with Section 151 of the Page No.# 3/3
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, the Code) for stay/suspension of the operation and execution of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the learned Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Assam in Reat/ Assam/Appeal No.05/2024.
3. It has been submitted that an amount of Rs.10,87,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs and Eighty Seven Thousand) only had already been deposited by the appellant before the Tribunal pursuant to the order dated 21.06.2024 passed in the First Appeal filed before the learned Appellate Tribunal. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that there is a direction in the impugned judgment dated 29.11.2024 for disbursing an amount of Rs.10,57,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs and Fifty Seven Thousand) only to the respondent.
4. Taking into account that the instant appeal has already been admitted by formulating the substantial question of law, it is the opinion of this Court that ends of justice would be met if the impugned direction so passed in paragraph No.23 of the judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 is stayed till the disposal of the present appeal. Accordingly, the directions contained in paragraph 23 of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 is stayed till the disposal of the appeal.
5. Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!