Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6437 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010197422023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MFA/81/2023
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT 87, M.G. ROAD, FORT,
MUMBAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT STAR CITY COMPLEX,
5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR G.S. ROAD,
GUWAHATI- 781007, AND A BRANCH OFFICE AT TINSUKIA IMPLEADED AS
O.P. NO. 2 IN W.C CASE NO. 03/2014.
VERSUS
SUMAN DEVI AND 3 ORS.
W/O LATE SHIV NATH SAH,
R/O MARGHERITA BALUKHAD, P.O. AND P.S.- MARGHERITA,
DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM), PIN- 786181.
2:RAJVEER SAH
S/O LATE SHIV NATH SAH
R/O MARGHERITA BALUKHAD
P.O. AND P.S.- MARGHERITA
DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM)
PIN- 786181.
BEING MINOR
REP. BY HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER
THAT IS
RESPONDENT NO. 1.
3:ROHIT SAH
S/O LATE SHIV NATH SAH
R/O MARGHERITA BALUKHAD
P.O. AND P.S.- MARGHERITA
Page No.# 2/3
DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM)
PIN- 786181.
BEING MINOR
REP. BY HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER
THAT IS
RESPONDENT NO. 1.
4:SANKAR KUMAR PRADHAN
S/O KRISHNA KUMAR PRADHAN
R/O MARGHERITA
NEAR POST OFFICE
P.O. AND P.S.- MARGHERITA
DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM)
PIN- 786181
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MS. M SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A K GUPTA (r-1), MS B SARMA (r-1),MR. R S MISHRA (r-1)
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
30-09-2024 Heard Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the appellant.
None has appeared for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3.
The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the notice could not be served upon the respondent No. 4 even through dasti service, as the respondent No.4 has changed his address.
The learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that this appeal has been preferred by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against the quantum awarded by judgment and order dated 13.07.2023 passed by the learned Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum- Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Tinsukia in W.C.Case No. 03/2014 and that this appeal may be decided remaining absence of the respondent No. 4.
Page No.# 3/3
The learned counsel for the appellant prays for striking out the name of the respondent No.4 from the cause title.
Prayer of the appellant is allowed.
The Registry shall strike out the name of the respondent No.4 from the cause title of this appeal.
The records of the Trial Court have been received.
Let the case be listed for hearing in its usual course.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!