Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajit Das And 9 Ors vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors Represented ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 6430 Gua

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6430 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2024

Gauhati High Court

Ajit Das And 9 Ors vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors Represented ... on 30 September, 2024

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam

                                                                     Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010179532024




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/4446/2024

         1: AJIT DAS AND 9 ORS.
         S/O- LATE DINANATH DAS, VILL.- DAPARBATIA,
         P.S. TEZPUR, P.O. TEZPUR- 784001, DIST.SONITPUR, ASSAM

         2: NARENDRA PRASAD
         S/O- LATE BIKRAMA PRASAD C/O- SHRI GARLABH KAKATI
         GOTLONG GANDHI NAGAR DOLABARI P.O. TEZPUR-784001
         DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

         3: ANUP KUMAR METYA
         S/O- LATE AJIT KUMAR METYA C/O- SHRI FARHAN ZAHIR VILL.-
         BARIKACHUBURI NEAR GOLD DIGITAL CINEMA HALL P.O. TEZPUR-
         784001 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

         4: RENU BORAH
         LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE AND W/O- LATE BOKUL BORAH
         VILL.- SAMDHARAKALIABOR P.O.SILGHAT-784123 DIST. NAGAON
         ASSAM

         5: DEBEN TALUKDAR
         S/O- LATE NAGEN TALUKDAR HEM NAGAR RUBBER BAGAN
         P.O.TEZPUR-784001 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

         6: MONORANJAN MANDAL
         S/O- LATE PRABHAT MANDAL 1811 MASJID ROAD DOLABARI
         KALIABHOMORAP.O. TEZPUR-784027 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

         7: RUMI DAS
         LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE AND W/O- LATE BANUDHAR DAS WARD NO. 11
         TOLL- KOLIBARIP.O. TEZPUR - 784001 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

         8: ARCHANA BISWAS
         LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE AND W/O- LATE KARTICK BISWAS
         VILL.- BARIKACHUBURI JYOTI NAGAR P.O. TEZPUR-784001 DIST.
         SONITPUR ASSAM
                                                                       Page No.# 2/3

            9: SARAJIT NAG
            S/O- LATE RABINDRA CH. NAG NEPALI PATTY
            NEAR GANESH MILLP.O. TEZPUR-784001 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

            10: BINOY KUMAR NATH
            S/O- LATE DEBAN CHANDRA NATH VILL.- BESSERIA PUKHURIA
            P.O. BESSERIA-784150 DIST.SONITPUR ASSAM

                          VERSUS

            1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF
            SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, CIVIL SECRETARIAT,P.O. DISPUR,
            GHY-781006, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM

            2:SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
            PUBLIC WORKS (BUILDING AND NH) DEPARTMENT CIVIL SECRETARIAT
            P.O. DISPUR GHY-781006 DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM

            3:PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE
            DEPARTMENT CIVIL SECRETARIAT P.O. DISPUR GHY-781006
            DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM

            4:CHIEF ENGINEER PWD BUILDING ASSAM GOVT. OF ASSAM
            CHANDMARI GHY-781003 DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM

            5:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD TEZPUR ELECTRICAL DIVISION
            RUBBER BAGAN P.O. TEZPUR-784001 DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR P CHOWDHURY, MR. V K CHANDAK,MRS N. AGARWAL
                               CHANDAK
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,SC, PWD

                                   BEFORE
                      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

                                        ORDER

Date : 30-09-2024

Heard Mr. P. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, Assam; Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam and Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the official respondents.

Page No.# 3/3

Mr. Dhar submits that the prayer of the petitioner for regularization in service cannot be considered in view of the decision of this Court rendered in the case of State of Assam -Vs- Upen Das & Ors. , reported in 2020 (5) GLT

605. However, the learned Standing Counsel, PWD has not denied or disputed the fact that the petitioners would be entitled to the benefit flowing from the judgment rendered in Upen Das & Ors. (supra).

Mr. P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time to examine the legal issue involved in the matter and address the Court.

As such, on the request of the petitioners' counsel, this writ petition is directed to be posted again on 18.11.2024.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter