Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7943 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010134212024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3496/2024
UMA KANTA KAKATI
S/O LATE PODU RAM KAKATI, VILL- PUTANI MOHAR CHUK, P.O.-PUTANI
GOMOTHA GAON, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782102
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
4:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM
JURIPAR
SIX MILE
GUWAHATI-37
5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
ASSAM
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
Page No.# 2/3
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ZILLA PARISHAD
NAGAON
P.O. AND DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782001
7:THE TREASURY OFFICER
NAGAON TREASURY
P.O. AND DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78200
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, MS A KHATUN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, FINANCE,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 30.10.2024
Heard Mr. M Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Handique, learned standing counsel, P&RD and Mr. P. Nayak, learned standing counsel, Finance department for the respondents No. 3 and 7.
Mr. P. Handique, learned standing counsel by placing the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Director General, Doordarshan Prasar Bharti Corporation of India andAnother -vs- Magi H. Desai reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 336, submits that the principle of law in the judgment of the Division Bench in the case of State of Assam -vs- Syed Md. Fazlay Rabbi in WA 145/2009, which was taken to appeal, although the Hon'ble Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP, has been overruled.
He prays that he may be granted 2 (two) weeks time to file affidavit and argue the matter basing on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to hereinabove.
Page No.# 3/3
Considering the submissions, I deem it appropriate to grant 2 (two) weeks time to file affidavit.
List this matter after 3 (three) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!