Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7933 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010227112024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./428/2024
ASHOK SAH AND ANR
S/O LATE KAMAKHYA PRASAD SAH, RESIDENT OF MAKUM SUNDAY
MARKET, PO AND PS MAKUM, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM 786170
2: M/S KAMAKHYA PRASAD SAH
REPRESENTED BY SRI ASHOK SAH
A SHOP HOUSE SITUATED AT MAKUM SUNDAY MARKET
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM 78617
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM
2:MOHENDRA KALITA
S/O AMRIT KALITA
FOOD SAFETY OFFICER
O/O THE JOINT DIRECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES
TINSUKIA
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : A. K. KANU, MR M AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/1016/2024
Page No.# 2/4
ASHOK SAH AND ANR
S/O LATE KAMAKHYA PRASAD SAH
RESIDENT OF MAKUM SUNDAY MARKET
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM 786170
2: M/S KAMAKHYA PRASAD SAH
REPRESENTED BY SRI ASHOK SAH
A SHOP HOUSE SITUATED AT MAKUM SUNDAY MARKET
PO AND PS MAKUM
DIST TINSUKIA
ASSAM 786170
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM
2:MOHENDRA KALITA
S/O AMRIT KALITA
FOOD SAFETY OFFICER
O/O THE JOINT DIRECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES
TINSUKIA
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : A. K. KANU
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
ORDER
Date : 30.10.2024
Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent No.1.
2. This is an application under Section 438/442 of BNSS, 2023, praying for Page No.# 3/4
setting aside and quashing the impugned judgment dated 19.09.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia in Criminal Appeal No. 02(1) of 2019, thereby dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment dated 10.12.2018 passed by the learned Additional CJM, Tinsukia in C.R. Case No. 251/2010, whereby convicting the applicants under Section 7 r/w Section 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and sentenced petitioner No. 1 to undergo s/i for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default stipulation and the petitioner No. 2 was directed to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-.
3. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant No.1 may be allowed to remain on previous bail or to go on fresh bail, till disposal of the revision petition.
4. On the other hand, Mr. Goswami, learned Additional Public prosecutor submits that he has no objection if the prayer of the applicants is allowed.
5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the judgment of the learned trial court.
6. Considering the sentence imposed by the learned trial court, without further going into the merit of the case, prayer of the applicants is allowed.
7. Accordingly, the applicant No.1, namely Ashok Sah, shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional CJM, Tinsukia, Assam.
8. The operation of impugned judgment and order dated 19.09.2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 2(1) of 2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Page No.# 4/4
Tinsukia, Assam and judgment and order dated 10.12.2018 passed by the learned Additional CJM, Tinsukia in connection with C.R. Case No. 251/2010, shall remain suspended till the disposal of criminal revision petition.
9. In view of the above, interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!