Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3337 Gua
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010205332023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/167/2023
MONIKANTA KALITA AND ANR.
S/O LATE MATURA KALITA,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZ BAGHBAR, PO AND PS BAGHBAR, DIST
BARPETA, ASSAM 781308
2: RANJIT KALITA
S/O LATE MATURA KALITA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZ BAGHBAR
PO AND PS BAGHBAR
DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 78130
VERSUS
BIJOY CHANDRA KALITA AND 2 ORS.
S/O LATE GANDARU KALITA,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZ BAGHBAR, PO AND PS BAGHBAR, DIST
BARPETA, ASSAM 781308
2:SRI GONDHORU RAM KALITA
S/O LATE GANDARU KALITA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZ BAGHBAR
PO AND PS BAGHBAR
DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781308
3:SMTI PURNIMA BALA BIDHOBA
W/O LATE GANDARU KALITA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZ BAGHBAR
PO AND PS BAGHBAR
DIST BARPETA
Page No.# 2/4
ASSAM 78130
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
15.05.2024
Heard Mr. M Dutta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants.
2. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, the Code) challenging the confirmation of the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2022 passed by the learned Munsiff No.1 Barpeta in Title Suit No.195/2015 by the rejection of the application for condonation of delay vide the order dated 13.06.2023 by the learned Civil Judge, Barpeta in Misc.(J) Case No.86/2022.
3. The instant appeal is admitted by formulating the following substantial questions of law:
(i).Whether the learned Trial Court was justified in decreeing the suit in favour of the plaintiff in absence of any document of title being produced?
(ii).Whether the learned First Appellate Court had exercised the powers Page No.# 3/4
under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in rejecting the application for condonation of delay in terms with the well ordained principles settled by the Supreme Court?
4. Issue notice, making it returnable by 24.06.2024.
5. The Appellants to take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by way of registered post as well as by usual process within three days.
6. In addition to that, the appellants are also directed to take steps upon the respondents by Dasti mode routed through the Registry of this Court and thereafter to file an affidavit of service on or before the next date fixed. It is made clear that the appellants can effect Dasti service through any other person known to them. However, the said person who effects the Dasti service shall file the affidavit of service.
7. This Court for the present is not inclined to call for the records, the same shall be considered on the next date fixed.
8. List again on 24.06.2024.
JUDGE Page No.# 4/4
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!